摘要
颈动脉狭窄支架植入术的常规入路分为桡动脉入路和股动脉入路。桡动脉入路具有穿刺口并发症少,患者舒适度增加和术后制动时间短等优点,越来越多的介入医师倾向选择经桡动脉入路行介入治疗。但目前这两种途径的优先选择仍有争议,因此我们旨在回顾经桡动脉对比经股动脉途径行颈动脉支架植入手术的文献,来阐明经桡动脉入路在安全性和可行性上的优势。
Conventional approaches for stent implantation for carotid artery stenosis are the radial and femoral approaches.The radial artery approach has the advantages of fewer puncture site complications,increased patient comfort,and shorter postoperative bed rest.Physicians conducting interventional procedures increasingly tend to choose the radial artery approach for interventional treatment.However,controversy remains concerning which of the two approaches should be preferred.Therefore,we aim to review the literature on carotid stent implantation through the radial versus femoral artery approaches to illustrate the advantages of the radial approach in terms of safety and feasibility.
作者
林咏泰
段金海
Lin Yongtai;Duan Jinhai(Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute,Guangdong Geriatrics Institute,Guangdong Neurology Institute,Department of Geriatric Neurology,Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences,Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510080,China)
出处
《中华老年医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第10期1269-1272,共4页
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基金
广州市科技计划项目(201904010066)
广东省科技计划项目(2020A1414040027)
广东省自然科学基金(2023A1515012780)。
关键词
颈动脉狭窄
支架
桡动脉入路
Carotid stenosis
Stent
Transradial approach
