期刊文献+

斜仰卧截石位下超微通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗2.0~3.0 cm肾结石的临床疗效分析 被引量:7

Clinical efficacy of super-mini-percutaneous nephroscope combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in oblique supine lithotomy position in the treatment of 2.0-3.0 cm renal calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较斜仰卧截石位下Ⅰ期超微通道经皮肾镜(SMP)联合输尿管软镜(FURL)与单纯FURL治疗2.0~3.0 cm肾结石的疗效,探讨斜仰卧截石位下双镜联合(SMP联合FURL)治疗2.0~3.0 cm肾结石的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析2018年1月—2021年5月苏州大学附属常熟医院收治的2.0~3.0 cm肾结石患者55例,其中47例为复杂性肾结石。所有患者中,肾盂漏斗部夹角≤30°的肾下盏结石14例。23例采用双镜联合(SMP联合FURL)治疗(双镜联合组),32例行FURL治疗(FURL组)。对两组手术时间、血红蛋白下降值、术后住院时间、住院费用、结石清除率和并发症发生情况等进行比较分析。结果两组手术均顺利完成。双镜联合组平均血红蛋白下降值[(16.30±10.17)g/L]、术后住院时间[(5.35±1.61)d]、住院费用[(22481±2234)元]均高于FURL组[(6.94±6.61)g/L、(3.19±1.26)d、(18209±2584)元],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而两组手术时间[(79.57±8.52)min vs.(79.22±3.83)min]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1个月复查CT,双镜联合组结石清除率显著高于FURL组(91.30%vs.65.63%,P=0.027)。而两组患者的总并发症发生率(21.74%vs.21.88%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。双镜联合组接受再治疗1例(4.35%),FURL组接受再治疗5例(15.63%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论斜仰卧截石位下超微通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗2.0~3.0 cm肾结石具有结石一期清除率高、且与FURL相比不增加并发症发生风险的优点。 Objective To compare the clinical safety and effectiveness of super-mini-percutaneous nephroscope(SMP)combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL)in oblique supine lithotomy position and FURL alone in the treatment of 2.0-3.0 cm renal calculi.Methods Clinical data of 55 patients treated during Jan.2018 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed,including 47 cases complicated renal calculi,and 14 cases of lower calyceal calculi with infundibulopelvic angle≤30°.SMP combined with FURL was performed in 23 cases(combined group),and FURL alone was performed in 32 cases(FURL group).The operation time,hemoglobin reduction,postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization expenses,stone-clearance rate and complications were compared.Results All operations were successful.Compared with the FRUL group,the combined group had significantly more hemoglobin reduction[(16.30±10.17)g/L vs.(6.94±6.61)g/L],longer postoperative hospital stay[(5.35±1.61)d vs.(3.19±1.26)d],and higher hospitalization expenses[(22481±2234)yuan vs.(18209±2584)yuan](P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in operation time[(79.57±8.52)min vs.(79.22±3.83 min),P>0.05].One month after surgery,CT results showed that the combined group had higher stone-clearance rate(91.30%vs.65.63%,P=0.027).There was no difference in the complication rate(21.74%vs.21.88%,P>0.05).One case(4.35%)in the combined group and 5 cases(15.63%)in the FURL group received retreatment(P>0.05).Conclusion SMP combined with FURL in oblique supine lithotomy position is safe and effective in the treatment of 2.0-3.0 cm renal calculi,with high stone-clearance rate and low complication rate.
作者 丁琪 范波 朱海亮 范志江 李锋 屠文健 金晓华 DING Qi;FAN Bo;ZHU Hailiang;FAN Zhijiang;LI Feng;TU Wenjian;JIN Xiaohua(Department of Urology,Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University,Changshu No.1 People's Hospital,Changshu 215500,China)
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2023年第9期759-763,共5页 Journal of Modern Urology
基金 苏州市临床重点病种诊疗技术专项项目(No.LCZX201921) 苏州市产业技术创新专项项目(No.SYSD2017017) 常熟市科技发展计划项目(No.CR201712) 常熟市临床医学专家团队引进项目(No.CSYJTD202001) 常熟市医学重点学科项目(No.CSZDXK202001)。
关键词 复杂性肾结石 双镜联合 斜仰卧截石位 超微通道经皮肾镜 输尿管软镜 complicated renal calculi combined endoscopes oblique supine lithotomy position super-mini-percutaneous nephroscope flexible ureteroscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献70

  • 1曹正国,吴斌,诸禹平,苏红,孙友文,董晓程,朱明.一期多通道微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石和单通道经皮肾镜碎石治疗鹿角形肾结石的对照研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(9):906-909. 被引量:27
  • 2程跃,严泽军,谢国海,袁鹤胜,刘冠琳.“粉末化碎石”在输尿管软镜治疗肾结石中的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3). 被引量:64
  • 3徐桂彬,李逊,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣.微创经皮肾镜取石术出血量影响因素的分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):456-459. 被引量:123
  • 4吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1571. 被引量:7
  • 5叶章群.尿石症诊断治疗指南[M]//那彦群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:137-147. 被引量:4
  • 6Xu C, Song R J, Jiang M J, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients [ J ]. Urol Int, 2015, 94: 93-98. DOI: 10. 1159/ 000365578. 被引量:1
  • 7el-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, et al. Factors affecting stone- free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghom stone [ J ]. Urology, 2012, 79:1236 - 1241. DOI: 10. 1016/j. urology. 2012.01. 026. 被引量:1
  • 8Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures : an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2012,61:341-349. 被引量:1
  • 9Dauw CA, Simeon L, Alruwaily AF, et al. Contemporary practice patterns of flexible ureteroscopy for treating renal stones : results of a worldwide survey[ J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29 : 1221-1230. DOI: 10. 1089/end. 2015. 0260. 被引量:1
  • 10Bader M J, Gratzke C, Seitz M, et al. The "all-seeing needle": initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2011,59: 1054- 1059. DOI : 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2011.03. 026. 被引量:1

共引文献198

同被引文献74

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部