期刊文献+

欧盟碳边境调节机制及其对我国经济和贸易的影响 被引量:9

EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism:Disputes Between Different Parties and China's Response
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2023年4月25日,欧盟理事会正式通过碳边境调节机制(CBAM)的立法,推动欧盟的碳价格与进口产品的碳价格一致,以应对“碳泄漏”问题并保护本土产业的竞争力。欧盟作为世界重要经济体,其出台的碳边境调节机制实质上为贸易保护,对于世界贸易、全球经济复苏及增长可能产生重要影响。CBAM不仅对我国宏观经济、出口贸易、数据安全、对外直接投资以及碳中和工作等方面带来诸多挑战,CBAM也可能促进我国绿色可持续发展及相关行业深层次变革,促进碳排放领域深化改革。为应对欧盟碳边境调节机制,有必要提早谋划,商讨磋商机制并尽早积极行动。 On April 25,2023,Council of the European Union officially passed legislation on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM)to promot the EU's carbon prices to be equal to those of imported products,and to address the issue of“carbon leakage”and protect the competitiveness of local industries.As an important global economy,the carbon border regulation mechanism introduced by the EU is essentially a trade protection act,which may have a significant impact on world trade,global economic recovery,and growth.CBAM policy has brought many challenges to China's macro-economy,export trade,data security,outward foreign direct investment,carbon neutrality and other aspects.CBAM policy may also promote China's green and sustainable development and in-depth changes in related industries,and promote the deepening of reform in the field of carbon emissions.In order to respond to the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism,it is necessary to plan in advance,and discuss the consultation mechanism and actively take international trade measures as soon as possible.
作者 屈满学 QU Man-xue(School of Finance,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing,100029,PRC)
出处 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第5期105-113,共9页 Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重大项目“提高金融服务构建新发展格局质效路径研究”(21LLYJA054)。
关键词 碳边境调节机制 碳交易 碳泄漏 绿色贸易政策 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism carbon trading carbon leakage green trade policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献138

  • 1赵玉焕,郑璐,刘似臣.全球价值链嵌入对中国出口贸易隐含碳的影响研究[J].国际贸易问题,2021(3):142-157. 被引量:33
  • 2Barrett, S. International Cooperation for Sale[J]. European Economic Review, 2001, (45). 被引量:1
  • 3Bosetti, V., and J. Frankel. Global Climate Policy Architecture and Political Feasibility: Specific Formulas and Emission Targets to Attain 460ppm CO2 Concentrations[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 15516, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 4Eskeland, G., and A. Harrison. Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-haven Hypothesis [R]. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1744, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 5Feldstein,M. The Exploding Carbon Tax[J]. The Weekly Standard, 2009,(22). 被引量:1
  • 6Jiang, K., A. Cosbey, and D. Murphy. Embedded Carbon in Traded Goods[R]. Paper Prepared for the Seminar on Trade and Climate Change, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008,(18-20). 被引量:1
  • 7Jordan-Korte, K., and S. Mildner. Climate Protection and Border Tax Adjustment: Economic Rationale and Political Pitfalls of Current U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals[R]. FACET Analysis No.l, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 8Mendelsohn, R. Is the Stern Review an Economic Analysis [J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008, (2). 被引量:1
  • 9Nordhaus, W. After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming [J]. American Economic Review, 2006, (96). 被引量:1
  • 10Nordhaus, W. A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2007, (45). 被引量:1

共引文献379

同被引文献115

引证文献9

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部