摘要
自《刑法修正案(九)》出台,《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的适用效力争论就从未停止。源于该解释确定的“网络型”寻衅滋事罪与编造、故意传播虚假信息罪未能从理论上厘清“险情”的涵摄范围,导致在实践中存在模糊界域,以致司法实务难以把握二者的适用场域。基于承认解释有效的立场,从事实和规范的双重维度,采用限缩解释的技巧,确立“公共设施”标准界定“险情”内涵,可以较清晰解决两罪适用场域模糊之难题。
Since the promulgation of Amendment of Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China(IX),the debate on the applicable effect of the Interpretation of Certain Information on the Application of the Law to Criminal Cases Such as Defamation by Using Information Networks has never stopped.Be-cause the“network type”crime of provocation and the crime of fabricating intentional dissemination of false information determined by the interpretation fail to clarify the scope of“dangerous situation”in the-ory,resulting in fuzzy boundaries in practice,so that it is difficult for judicial practice to grasp the appli-cable fields of the two.Based on the position of recognizing the validity of interpretation,from the double dimensions of facts and norms,using the technique of limited interpretation,it is to establish the standard of“public facilities”and to define the connotation of“dangerous situation”,in order to solve the prob-lem of fuzzy application field of the two crimes.
作者
付恒
付雷荣
Fu Heng;Fu Lei-rong(Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610065,China)
出处
《四川民族学院学报》
2023年第3期72-78,97,共8页
Journal of Sichuan Minzu College
关键词
编造、故意传播虚假信息罪
“网络型”寻衅滋事罪
互联网谣言型犯罪
适用场域
crime of fabricating and deliberately spreading false information
“network type”crime of provocation
internet rumor crime
applicable field
