公司的权力机构:一个公法概念私法嬗变的历史进路、理论逻辑与当代意涵

Governing Body of a Company:Historical Development,Theoretical Logic,and Contemporary Implications of the Transmutation of Public Law and Private Law

下载PDF

导出

摘要《公司法》的修改引发了新一轮对公司治理模式的讨论。“权力机构”是《公司法》对股东会的规范定位,对其内涵的解读是形塑公司治理模式的关键。作为一个具有中国特色的公司治理概念,权力机构在内涵上有广义和狭义之分,但均具公法属性。回顾历史,“权力机构”曾是国营企业治理制度的核心概念,并先后经历了“权力机关”、“权力机构”、“行使权力的机构”三个阶段的历史变迁,有着特殊的生成背景与复杂的发展谱系。私法移用权力机构概念的原因有三:一是社会主义人民当家作主地位的制度证成;二是社会主义民主理念的制度表达;三是社会主义“国家所有”的制度表征。权力机构概念虽具有一定的历史局限性,但在特定的历史背景下承担着证成我国社会主义政治制度的特殊宪法使命。随着经济体制和政企关系的发展与转变,对权力机构概念的理解应采“弱公法”的解释进路,适当剥离其公法内涵。 The revision of the Company Law has sparked a new round of discussion on corporate governance models.The“governing body”is the normative positioning of the shareholders’meeting in the Company Law,and the interpretation of its connotation is the key to shaping the corporate governance model.As a concept of corporate governance with Chinese characteristics,the governing body has broad and narrow connotations,both of which have public law attributes.“Governing body”was once the core concept of the governance system of state-owned enterprises,and have undergone three stages of historical changes,i.e.,“organ of power”,“governing body”,and“institutions exercising power”,with a special forming background and complex development pedigree.There are three reasons for the transfer of the concept of governing body in private law:firstly,the institutional certification of the socialist people’s position as masters of the country;secondly,the institutional expression of socialist democratic concepts;and thirdly,the institutional representation of socialist“state ownership”.Although the concept of governing body has certain historical limitations,it bears the special constitutional mission of proving China’s socialist political system in a specific historical context.With the development and transformation of the economic system and the relationship between government and enterprises,the understanding of the concept of governing body should adopt the interpretation approach of“weak public law”,and its public law connotation should be appropriately stripped off.

作者李铮 Li Zheng(Law School,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)

机构地区天津大学法学院

出处《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》北大核心 2023年第5期55-64,共10页 Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基金 2022年度教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“地方法人的概念流变与央地关系的结构性重塑研究”(22JHQ077)的阶段性研究成果。

关键词权力机构公司治理股东会中心公司法 governing body corporate governance shareholders’meeting centrism company law

分类号 D922.291.91 [政治法律—经济法学]