摘要
目的:考察疫情前、疫情应急、常态化防控3个阶段基层干部的负性情绪特点、变化规律及其与认知灵活性、表达抑制的关系,为提升干部在应急状态下的心理调适能力提供借鉴。方法:采用认知灵活性问卷(Cognitive Flexibility Inventory,CFS)、情绪调节策略问卷(Emotion regulation questionaire,ERQ)、焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)、贝克抑郁量表(Beck Depression Inventory-I,BDI-I)对564名基层干部开展了间隔1年的3阶段追踪调查,使用SPSS 22.0和Mplus 7.0对所得面板数据予以分析。结果:1相关分析结果显示,在疫情前、疫情应急、常态化防控3个时间点上,基层干部的焦虑、抑郁与认知灵活性均呈显著负相关(r=-0.57,-0.29,-0.35,-0.63,-0.66,-0.78;P<0.01),与表达抑制均呈显著正相关(r=0.68,0.28,0.22,0.68,0.30,0.26;P<0.01);2重复测量方差分析结果显示,在上述3个时间点上,基层干部的焦虑有显著变化[F(2,562)=120.08,P<0.001],但抑郁无显著差异[F(2,562)=19.64,P<0.001],对焦虑的事后检验结果显示,应急状态下的焦虑显著高于疫情前[t(563)=19.64,P<0.001]、常态化防控阶段[t(563)=12.70,P<0.001];3交叉滞后分析结果显示,前测焦虑显著负向预测后测认知灵活性(β=-0.13,-0.26;P<0.01),前测认知灵活性显著负向预测后测表达抑制(β=-0.19,-0.33;P<0.001)和焦虑(β=-0.16,-0.33;P<0.01),前测表达抑制显著正向预测后测焦虑(β=0.33,0.41;P<0.001)、显著负向预测后测认知灵活性(β=-0.31,-0.16;P<0.01),应急状态下的焦虑显著正向预测常态化防控下的表达抑制(β=0.09,P<0.05)。结论:疫情防控背景下,基层干部的焦虑与认知灵活性、表达抑制相互影响,而应急状态下需重点纾解干部的焦虑情绪。
Objective:To investigate the emotional characteristics and change rules of grassroots cadres in different stages of epidemic prevention and control,and their relationships with cognitive flexibility and expression inhibition,to provide reference for improving the cadres’psychological adjustment ability in emergency state.Methods:Cognitive Flexibility Inventory(CFS),Emotion regulation questionaire(ERQ),Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SA-S)and Beck Depression Inventory-I(BDI-I)were conducted in a 3-stage follow-up survey of 564 grassroots cadres at an one year interval.SPSS 22.0 and Mplus 7.0 were used for correlation analysis,repeat-measures and cross-lag analysis.Results:1The result of correlation analysis showed that the grassroots cadres’anxiety and depression were significantly negative correlated with cognitive flexibility(r=-0.57,-0.29,-0.35,-0.63,-0.66,-0.78;P<0.01),and significantly positive correlated with expression suppression(r=0.68,0.28,0.22,0.68,0.30,0.26;P<0.01);2 The results of repeated measures analysis showed that the grassroots cadres’anxiety had a significant change[F(2,562)=120.08,P<0.001]at these 3 testing points,but there were no significant differences in depression[F(2,562)=19.64,P<0.001].The post-hoc test showed that the anxiety in emergency was significantly higher than pre-epidemic condition[t(563)=19.64,P<0.001]and regular control condition[t(563)=12.70,P<0.001].3 The result of cross-lag analysis showed that pretest anxiety significantly negatively predicted cognitive flexibility of posttest(β=-0.13,-0.26;P<0.01),and pretest cognitive flexibility significantly negatively predicted posttest expression inhibition(β=-0.19,-0.33;P<0.001)and anxiety(β=-0.16,-0.33;P<0.01).Furthermore,the result of pretest expression inhibition significantly positively predicted posttest anxiety(β=0.33,0.41;P<0.001),and significantly negatively predicted posttest cognitive flexibility(β=-0.31,-0.16;P<0.01).Anxiety in emergency condition significantly positively predicted expression inhibition in regular
作者
乔艳阳
王晓霞
王健
李洁
陈世民
QIAO Yanyang;WANG Xiaoxia;WANG Jian;LI Jie;CHEN Shimin(Tianjin Administration College,Tianjin 300191,China;Tianjin Anding Hosipital;School of Public Administration,China University of Mining and Technology)
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
北大核心
2023年第9期1331-1337,共7页
China Journal of Health Psychology
基金
全国社科规划项目(编号:20BSH144,20BZZ086)
天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(编号:TJSSZX20-66)
全国党校系统重点课题项目
中共天津市委党校(应急状态下基层干部心理调适能力培育研究)项目资助。
关键词
认知灵活性
心理调适能力
交叉滞后设计
焦虑
Cognitive flexibility
Psychological adjustment
Cross-lag analysis
Anxiety
