摘要
科技治理是一个被学界和实践者广泛使用的术语,用以区别于传统科技管理模式。然而,受制于“治理”的观点分野,科技治理的内涵与外延较为模糊,各理论构件呈现冲突性、碎片化特点。通过对我国科技建制历史的回溯发现,科技治理发轫于后现代社会科技创新活动特征变化所衍生的治理需求,体现了科技创新从“建制”到“解构”的历史趋势。因此,在“解构主义”基本原理指导下,将前沿治理理论与科技创新实践有机结合,从多个维度对科技治理进行阐释,指出科技治理以行动者网络作为行动结构,以后现代话语作为对话形式,以合作制组织作为组织形式,以行动主义作为互动形式,以良性、可持续创新生态作为发展目标。研究勾勒出后现代社会科技治理的理论图谱,可为我国未来科技治理改革实践提供方法论依据。
In recent years,science and technology(ST) governance has been widely used by both academics and practitioners to distinguish it from the traditional ST management.However,due to the divergence of views on governance,the connotation and denotation of ST governance are vague,and the theoretical components are of fragmentation and conflict with each other.This,in turn,limits the guiding function of ST governance for ST innovation practice.Hence,this paper aims to answer three fundamental questions:What is ST governance? Why should we adopt ST governance? How should we act in ST governance? It can be found that,through retrospecting the history of ST institutionalization in China,the governance paradigm changes are closely related with the transitions of characteristics of ST innovation activities in different historical stages.Since the founding of New China,ST innovation has witnessed a process of continuous strengthening in institutionalization.As human beings step into the post-modern society,some new problems have been emerging in the social collective actions around ST innovation:"unmanageability" of ST development issues,the VUCA(Volatility,Uncertainty,Complexity,Ambiguity) as the prominent characteristic of process of ST innovation,high dependence of innovation to cooperation,diminishment of marginal utility of ST investment,institutional lag triggered by the acceleration of changes of ST,etc.But the ST management which advocates institutionalization seems to fail to deal with these challenges,because it's difficult to put forward the solutions to these problems under the framework of “management”.On the basis of critical reflection on institutionalization,ST governance puts forward “deconstructivism” as the best medicine to post-modernity,catering for the new changes happening in ST innovation practices.ST represents a governance paradigm and action process of ST social collective action in line with the post-modern society,and it reconstructs the practice which is under the ST management paradigm f
作者
李杨
孟溦
Li Yang;Meng Wei(School of Public Administration,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处
《科技进步与对策》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第16期52-61,共10页
Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(YBNLTS2022-025)
上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究重点项目(20692117100)。
关键词
后现代社会
科技治理
解构主义
合作制组织
行动主义
Post-modern Society
Science and Technology Governance
Deconstructivism
Cooperative Organization
Activism
