期刊文献+

中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差联合其与动脉-中心静脉氧含量差的比值在脓毒性休克患者早期预后评估中的价值

Early prognostic value of central venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension combined with its ratio to arterial-central venous oxygen content in patients with septic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差(GAP)联合GAP与动脉-中心静脉氧含量差比值(GAP比值)在脓毒性休克患者早期预后评估中的价值。方法选取2018年1月至2022年4月宁波市医疗中心李惠利医院收治的571例脓毒性休克患者进行回顾性分析,根据入院时的GAP和GAP比值分为4组,其中A组(180例):GAP≤6 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133kPa)且GAP比值≤1.8,B组(35例):GAP>6 mmHg且GAP比值≤1.8,C组(113例):GAP≤6 mmHg且GAP比值>1.8,D组(243例):GAP>6 mmHg且GAP比值>1.8。根据患者28 d的转归情况分为存活组(339例)和死亡组(232例)。分析各组患者的基本资料、临床和预后指标,采用二元Logistic回归分析影响脓毒性休克患者预后的危险因素,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析GAP联合GAP比值在脓毒性休克早期预后评估中的价值。结果四组间乳酸、心排量(cardiac output,CO)、血管活性药物评分(vasoactive-inotropic score,VIS)、急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHE-Ⅱ)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、拔管率和28 d病死率差异均有统计学意义(Z=18.89,F=101.29,Z=131.58,F=24.19,F=24.82,χ^(2)=197.19,χ^(2)=191.58;均P<0.001)。A组与C组的CO分别为(5.2±1.5)L/min和(4.8±1.5)L/min,均高于D组,差异均有统计学意义(t=15.87和13.80,均P<0.001);D组的VIS、APACHE-Ⅱ、SOFA和28 d病死率分别为20.8(10.9,33.5)分、(23.8±9.1)分、(13.4±7.0)分和72.0%,均高于其他三组,差异均有统计学意义(Z=11.76、5.46和5.41;t=8.21、3.70和3.86;t=8.54、3.69和4.46;χ^(2)=191.05、37.38和42.34;均P<0.05);D组的拔管率为24.7%,低于其他三组,差异均有统计学意义(χ^(2)=172.55、47.56和56.92,均P<0.001)。二元Logistic回归分析显示乳酸、VIS、GAP和GAP比值是患者死亡的独立危险因素,风险比(OR)值分别为1.14、1.12、1.42和6.51。ROC曲线分析中发现,GAP约登指数为0.53,预测脓毒性休克患者死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.84(95%CI:0.81~0.88),最佳临界值为6.48 mmHg时,敏感性76.3%,特 Objective To investigate the early prognostic value of central venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension(GAP)combined with GAP to arterial-central venous oxygen content ratio(GAP ratio)in patients with septic shock.Methods A total of 571 ICU patients with septic shock in Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital from January 2018 to April 2022 were selected as the research objects for the retrospective study.According to the GAP and GAP ratio at the time of admission,patients were divided into four groups:group A(180 cases):GAP≤6 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)and GAP ratio≤1.8;group B(35 cases):GAP>6 mmHg and GAP ratio≤1.8;group C(113 cases):GAP≤6 mmHg and GAP ratio>1.8;group D(243 cases):GAP>6 mmHg and GAP ratio>1.8.According to 28-day mortality,the patients were divided into survival group(339 cases)and death group(232 cases).The basic data,clinical and prognostic indicators of patients in each group were recorded and analyzed.Binary Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors influencing the prognosis of patients with septic shock.The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)was drawn to analyze the early prognostic value of GAP and GAP ratio for septic shock.Results There were significant differences in lactate,cardiac output(CO),vasoactive-inotropic score(VIS),acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE-Ⅱ),sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),extubation rate,and 28-day mortality among different groups(Z=18.89,F=101.29,Z=131.58,F=24.19,F=24.82,χ^(2)=197.19,χ^(2)=191.58,all P<0.001).The levels of CO in group A and group C were(5.2±1.5)L/min and(4.8±1.5)L/min,respectively,which were higher than that in group D with significant differences(t=15.87 and 13.80,both P<0.001).The VIS,APACHE-Ⅱ,SOFA and 28-day mortality rate in group D were 20.8(10.9,33.5),(23.8±9.1),(13.4±7.0)and 72.0%,respectively,which were higher than those in the other three groups with significant differences(Z=11.76,5.46 and 5.41;t=8.21,3.70 and 3.86;t=8.54,3.69 and 4.46;χ^(2)=191.05,37.38 and 42.34;all P<0.05
作者 郑科斌 方雪威 翁一如 潘振涛 周银超 郑施 宋芳 叶恭杰 Zheng Kebin;Fang Xuewei;Weng Yiru;Pan Zhentao;Zhou Yinchao;Zheng Shi;Song Fang;Ye Gongjie(Intensive Care Unit,Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315040,China;School of Medicine,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,China)
出处 《国际流行病学传染病学杂志》 CAS 2023年第3期171-177,共7页 International Journal of Epidemiology and Infectious Disease
基金 宁波市医学科技计划(2021Y01) 宁波市自然科学基金(2019A610276)。
关键词 休克 脓毒性 中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差/动脉-中心静脉氧含量差 重症医学科 预后 回归分析 危险因素 Shock,septic Central venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension to arterial-venous oxygen content ratio Intensive care unit Prognosis Regression analysis Risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献79

  • 1张耀春,王彦,王立为.左西孟旦的药理、毒理学研究综述[J].中国药物应用与监测,2005,2(1):59-61. 被引量:20
  • 2AlmiranteB, RodríguezD, ParkBJ, et al. Epidemiology and predictors of mortality in cases of Candida bloodstream infection:results from population-based surveillance, barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2005, 43(4):1829-1835. 被引量:1
  • 3DellingerRP, LevyMM, CarletJM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1):296-327. 被引量:1
  • 4FauciAS, MorensDM. The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(5):454-461. 被引量:1
  • 5LuzzaniA, PolatiE, DorizziR, et al. Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2003, 31(6):1737-1741. 被引量:1
  • 6SunYM, HoangT, NeubauerJA, et al. Opioids protect against substantia nigra cell degeneration under conditions of iron deprivation:a mechanism of possible relevance to the Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) and Parkinson's disease[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2011, 304(1-2):93-101. 被引量:1
  • 7MencacciA, LeliC, CardacciaA, et al. Procalcitonin predicts real-time PCR results in blood samples from patients with suspected sepsis[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12):e53279. 被引量:1
  • 8MarraAR, EdmondMB, ForbesBA, et al. Time to blood culture positivity as a predictor of clinical outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(4):1342-1346. 被引量:1
  • 9MeidaniM, KhorvashF, AbolghasemiH, et al. Procalcitonin and quantitative C-reactive protein role in the early diagnosis of sepsis in patients with febrile neutropenia[J]. South Asian J Cancer, 2013, 2(4):216-219. 被引量:1
  • 10AdibM, BakhshianiZ, NavaeiF, et al. Procalcitonin:a reliable marker for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis[J]. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 2012, 15(2):777-782. 被引量:1

共引文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部