摘要
《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(十一)》增设“催收非法债务罪”,积极规制“涉黑涉恶”的非法讨债行为,是将“软暴力”纳入刑法规制范围的又一例证,有利于完善刑法规制体系,消减“以刑制罪”的实务倾向。同时,该罪的刑法体系定位再次阐明我国刑法中的财产犯罪是以“法律—经济财产说”为理论基础,占有不是刑法所要保护的法益,而是一种隐性构成要件要素,唯有法秩序所承认的经济利益才可能成为财产犯罪的行为对象。原则上,民法不予保护的债务刑法亦不予保护,以维护法秩序的统一与内在平衡。
“Criminal Law Amendment(XI)”added the“crime of collecting illegal debts”to actively regulate the illegal debt collection behaviors“involving gangsters and evil”.It is another example of incorporating“soft violence”into the scope of criminal law regulation,which is helpful to improve the criminal law regulation system and reduce the practical tendency of“using punishment to punish crime”.At the same time,the positioning of the criminal law system of this crime once again clarifies that the property crime in China’s criminal law is based on the theory of“law-economic property”.Possession is not a legal interest protected by criminal law,but an implicit constituent element.Only the economic interests recognized by the order may become the object of property crimes.In principle,debts that are not protected in civil law are also not protected in criminal law,in order to maintain the unity and internal balance of the legal order.
作者
宋睿
Song Rui(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2023年第3期61-67,共7页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
基金
2021年国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字经济的刑事安全风险防范体系建构研究”(项目编号:21&ZD209)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
财产犯罪
以刑制罪
软暴力
非法催债
property crime
using punishment to punish crime
soft violence
illegal debt collection
