摘要
我国行政审判引入主观公权利理论作为利害关系标准的分析框架,成功地激活了行政法,但也引发了“理论空转”和“保护限缩”的论争。实践中,主观公权利不仅面临诉权限缩、私法审查、判决类型缺位等难题,规范式、私法式、衍生式、一体式的权利理论探索,也未能突破体系封闭、个别解释、难以识别等局限。基于行政法“分化与统合”发展、请求权体系链接的启示,回到公法地位关系上的交互体系建构,既可以纾解主观公权利理论的本土适用困局,又可以统合行政关联领域,建立起公私法衔接适用的制度体系。主观公权利体系与各关联领域的交互构造,还可以为行政法总论和分论体系的建构奠定基础。
The introduction of subjective public rights theory as the analytical framework for the standard of interest in our administrative trials has successfully activated administrative law,but has also led to debates on"doctrinal vacillation"and"protection limitation".In practice,subjective public rights face problems such as narrowing the scope of the plaintiff,using private law to review,and lacking specific types of judgments,the exploration of normative,private,derivative,and all-in-one theories has also failed to break through the limitations of closed systems,individual interpretations,and identification difficulties.Based on the enlightenment of the"division and unification"of administrative law and the linking function of claim rights,it can not only resolve the incompatibility of theoretical localization,but also integrate administrative related fields,and establish a system that connects public law and private law.The interaction of subjective public rights with specific related fields can also support the construction of the unified system in administrative law.
作者
张栋祥
HANG Dongxiang(Law School,Shandong Normal University,Jinan Shandong 250358,China)
出处
《法学论坛》
北大核心
2023年第4期66-75,共10页
Legal Forum
基金
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究项目《行政处罚主观归责逻辑及其体系化研究》(21SFB4025)的阶段性成果。
关键词
主观公权利
请求权
行政关联领域
交互体系
subjective public rights
the claim right
administrative related fields
the interactive system
