摘要
欧盟GDPR在“谷歌案”后逐步确立了被遗忘权的概念,我国《个人信息保护法》第47条在借鉴GDPR被遗忘权理论的同时对个人信息删除权进行了较为具体的规定,但其在具体内涵上与欧盟被遗忘权的概念存在分野与辨析空间。在司法实践的应用之中,各法院对第47条的理解与适用存在一定分歧,需要在解释论上进行统一。在判断处理目的是否实现以及处理目的必要性时,需要通过公众知情权与个人信息删除权的利益平衡进行判断,并结合不同场景划定信息删除义务主体的范围;对于删除权的实现,实质性的物理删除应优先于匿名化的形式,以最大程度消除个人信息之上可能的信息聚合风险。
The EU GDPR has gradually established the concept of the right to be forgotten after the"Google case".Article 47 of China's Personal Information Protection Law draws on the theory of the right to be forgotten in China and makes more specific provisions on the right to delete personal information,but its specific connotation is different from the concept of the right to be forgotten.In the application of judicial practice,courts are divided in their interpretation and application of Section 47,which need to be unified in explanation theory.When judging whether the purpose of processing is realized and the necessity of the purpose of processing,it is necessary to balance the interests of the public right to know and the right to delete personal information,and combine different scenarios to delineate the scope of the subject of the information deletion obligation.For the realization of the right of deletion,substantive physical deletion should take precedence over anonymization to eliminate the risk of information aggregation as much as possible.
作者
黄宇轩
王英明
Huang Yuxuan;Wang Yingming
出处
《理论界》
2023年第6期72-79,共8页
Theory Horizon
关键词
个人信息保护法
删除权
被遗忘权
Personal Information Protection Law
right to erasure
right to be forgotten
