摘要
共同债务认定在夫妻债务纠纷处理中处于基础性地位,但现有研究暴露出程序和实体衔接不足的缺陷,从民事一体化视角研究殊为必要。在系统解读夫妻共同债务认定规则的基础上,透过案件上诉率和再审率以及个案说理情况可以发现,《民法典》第一千零六十四条存在价值失衡、标准模糊和证明规则适用机械等问题。基于此,有针对性地提出完善建议,既能助力夫妻债务纠纷妥善处理,又能有效回应“总结实践经验”的立法期许,推动夫妻债务诉讼规则摆脱“极端化”立法的窠臼,逐步实现多重价值均衡。
The identification of joint debt plays a fundamental role in the settlement of marital debt disputes,but the existing research exposes the defect of insufficient connection between Procedural law and substantive law,so it is necessary to study from the perspective of civil integration.Based on the systematic interpretation of the rules for the identification of joint debts between husband and wife,it can be found through the appeal rate and retrial rate of cases at the macro level and the case reasoning at the micro level that Article 1064 of the Civil Code has problems such as value imbalance,fuzzy standards and mechanical application of proof rules.Based on this,targeted suggestions are put forward,which can not only help properly deal with marital debt disputes,but also effectively respond to the legislative expectation of“summation of practical experience”,promote the marital debt litigation rules to get rid of the“extreme”legislation,and gradually realize the balance of multiple values.
作者
訾培玉
Zi Peiyu(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2023年第4期145-156,共12页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2022年国家社会科学基金哲学社会科学领军人才项目“中国式现代化视域下的诉源治理体系创新研究”(项目编号:22VRC029)
2022年湖南省研究生科研创新重点资助项目“民事一体化视域下夫妻债务认定、执行问题研究”(项目编号:CX20220531)的阶段性成果。
关键词
夫妻共同债务
认定标准
证明责任
法律推定
joint debts of husband and wife
identification criteria
burden of proof
law presumption
