摘要
“直接适用的法”制度入法后,我国法律规避制度的适用位阶和功能定位更加模糊。观照立法意旨,法律规避制度应不再适用于涉外担保合同纠纷,且其“强制性规定”相关表述与“直接适用的法”在范围上构成补集,强调对当事人规避行为的惩治以及对国内民商事实体强行性规范适用的维护。实然状态下的司法实践中,由于审判路径依赖和构成要件认定复杂,法律规避制度客观性特征阙如,主观性特征遭到消解,成为“直接适用的法”制度的子集,丧失了其作为一般性制度存在的必要性基础。然而,在涉外同性婚姻法律适用以及同等规制规避内、外域法行为等典型国际私法场景下,法律规避仍有其存在的合理性预期,应以单行立法的方式予以保留。
After the"directly applicable law"system has been incorporated into the law,the application level and functional orientation of the evasion of law system have been further blurred.From the perspective of legislative intent,the evasion of law system shall no more be applicable to disputes over foreign-related guarantee contracts,and its"mandatory provisions"are complementary in scope to the directly applicable law,emphasizing the punishment of evasions by the parties and the preservation of the application of the mandatory norms of domestic civil and commercial entities.In judicial practice,due to the dependence of court trial path and the complexity of determination of its applicable requirements,the evasion of law has become a subset of the"directly applicable law"system with its objective character being eliminated and its subjective character being diminished,and has gradually lost its necessary basis as a general system.However,in some typical private international situations,such as the legal application same-sex marriage involving foreigners and the equal regulation of the evasion of domestic and foreign law,the existence of the evasion of law should be retained as a practical way of sep arate legislation.
作者
唐金翎
马忠法
TANG Jin-ling;MA Zhong-fa(School of law,Fudan University,Shanghai,200438,China)
出处
《福建江夏学院学报》
2023年第3期56-67,共12页
Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建人类命运共同体国际法治创新研究”(18ZDA153)
国家社会科学基金重点项目“‘人类命运共同体’国际法理论与实践研究”(18AFX025)。
关键词
法律规避制度
“直接适用的法”
涉外民商事关系法律适用
强制性规定
evasion of law system
directly applicable law
application of laws for foreign-related civil and commercial relations
mandatory provisions
