摘要
我国专利侵权获利赔偿标准的适用表现出“判赔额高、判赔率高、适用率低”的特征,但这并不意味着背离了司法实践的需求,而是因为其具体适用面临现实困境。一方面,我国专利权人受到客观举证能力的限制,现有的证据保全、书证提出命令、证据调查令制度难以有效提高其举证能力,极大地打击了专利权人主张侵权获利赔偿的积极性;另一方面,我国裁判者受到主观适用标准的约束,因果关系定性错误、具体计算缺乏指引、自由裁量空间不足等问题长期未被纠正,导致法官难以合理灵活地运用专利侵权获利标准确定赔偿数额。为此,需要分别从立法论与解释论的路径入手,针对上述问题提出解决对策,即在立法层面要完善我国专利侵权获利证据收集制度,提高专利权人对专利侵权获利证据的举证能力,在司法层面加强对专利侵权获利赔偿标准的适用指引,提高专利侵权获利赔偿标准的适用率。
The application of damages for illicit profits for patent infringement in China shows the characteristics of"high award amount,high award rate and low application rate",but this is not because it deviates from the needs of judicial practice,but because its specific application faces realistic difficulties.On the one hand,Chinese patentees are limited by their objective ability to prove,and the existing system of evidence preservation,documentary evidence order and evidence investigation order is difficult to effectively improve their ability to prove,which greatly discourages patentees from claiming compensation for infringement;on the other hand,Chinese judges are bound by the subjective application of standards,and the problems of incorrect characterization of causation,lack of guidelines for specific calculations and insufficient discretionary space have not been corrected for a long time.On the other hand,judges in China are constrained by the subjective application of the standard,the wrong characterization of causation,the lack of guidelines for specific calculations,and the lack of discretionary space.In this regard,it is necessary to propose countermeasures for the above problems from the paths of legislative theory and interpretation theory respectively,namely,at the legislative level,to improve the system of collecting evidence of patent infringement profits in China,to enhance the ability of patent owners to prove evidence of patent infringement profits,and at the judicial level,to strengthen the guidelines for the application of the patent infringement profits compensation standard,and to improve the application rate of the patent infringement profits compensation standard.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2023年第5期60-73,共14页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
2021年度国家社科基金重大项目“总体国家安全观下产业知识产权风险治理现代化研究”(项目批准号:21&ZD203)的阶段性成果。
关键词
侵权获利赔偿
因果关系
证据收集
具体计算
自由裁量
Compensation for Illicit Profits
Causality
Evidence Collection
Specific Calculation
Discretionary
