摘要
近年来,中国学术界关于“学术评价”的讨论持续不断;由于涉及学科不同、站位不同,所以给出的答案自然是见仁见智。但从中国学术的实际而言,所谓“学术”,其实包含着学术论文、学术编辑、学术期刊三大块。其中,“期刊”是入口,“论文”是出口,“编辑”则起着中枢和关键性作用,三者共同组成一个完整、健康的学术生态链。因此,学术评价不能只见“物”而不见“人”,应当将学术编辑(包括总编辑)也纳入其中。无论是评判论文、期刊还是编辑,共同的标准只能有一条,那就是,有没有坚守、体现、力行学术的本质——“真、善、美、爱、仁”。
In recent years,there has been a continuous discussion on“academic evaluation”in Chinese academia.Due to the different disciplines and different positions,the answers are naturally different.However,from the reality of Chinese academics,the so-called“academics”actually includes three major parts:academic papers,academic editors,and academic journals.“Journal”is the entrance,“paper”is the exit,and“editor”plays the central and key role.The three together form a complete and healthy academic ecological chain.Therefore,academic evaluation should not only see“paper”but also“editor”.The academic editors(including chief editors)should also be included.Whether it is judging papers,journals or editors,there is only one common standard of adhering to,embodying and practicing the essence of academics,namely,“truth,goodness,beauty,love and benevolence”.
作者
田卫平
TIAN Wei-ping(Editorial Office of South China Quarterly,University of Macao,Macao SAR 999078,China)
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第4期9-14,共6页
Hebei Academic Journal
关键词
学术评价
职业编辑
见“物”见“人”
academic evaluation
professional editors
see both“paper”and“editors”
