摘要
目的了解新型温控射频技术对于阴道松弛相关FSD的最佳治疗次数及具体治疗疗效,并采用主观及客观评估指标结合方式进行评估。方法2020年7月至2021年2月至北京大学深圳医院妇科门诊就诊的FSD患者并具有VRS症状者,予新型温控射频技术治疗3次及5次,比较患者治疗3次时与治疗5次时的检测结果,评估新型温控射频技术治疗阴道松弛相关的FSD的疗效,并探讨不同治疗次数的疗效对比,以及客观及主观评估方式结果改变。结果(1)治疗3次后FSFI量表得分平均为(26.59±3.92),治疗5次FSFI量表平均得分为(27.12±1.84),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)治疗3次后阴道容指治疗有效性与治疗5次后阴道容指治疗有效性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)治疗3次后阴道口闭合程度治疗有效性与治疗5次后阴道口闭合程度治疗有效性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)治疗3次后与治疗5次后VLQ得分差具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(5)治疗3次后盆底肌肌力提升治疗有效性与治疗5次后盆底肌肌力提升治疗有效性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在客观评估指标中,新型温控射频治疗3次与治疗5次无明显疗效差异,而主观评估指标中,射频治疗5次优于治疗3次。在保证客观评估指标有效的情况下,可以适当减少治疗次数。
Objective To investigate the optimal treatment frequency and specific therapeutic effect of new radiofrequency temperature control technology for vaginal laxation-related FSD,and to evaluate it by combining subjective and objective evaluation indicators.Methods From July 2020 to February 2021,FSD patients with VRS symptoms were treated with the new radiofrequency temperature control technology 3 times and 5 times.The results were compared between 3 times and 5 times,and the efficacy of the new radiofrequency temperature control technology in the treatment of vaginal relaxation related FSD was evaluated.The results of different treatment times were compared and the changes of objective and subjective evaluation methods were also discussed.Results(1)The average of FSFI scale after 3 treatments was(26.59±3.92),and the average of FSFI scale after 5 treatments was(27.12±1.84),the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).(2)There was no significant difference of vaginal volume after 3 times of treatment and 5 times of treatment(P>0.05).(3)There was no significant difference between the closure degree of the vaginal opening after 3 treatments and the closure degree of the vaginal opening after 5 treatments(P>0.05).(4)The difference of VLQ score after 3 and 5 treatments was statistically significant(P<0.05).(5)There was no statistically significant difference between the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle strength enhancement after 3 treatments and that after 5 treatments(P>0.05).Conclusion In the objective evaluation index,there is no significant difference between the new temperature control radiofrequency treatment 3 times and 5 times,while in the subjective evaluation index,5 times of radiofrequency treatment is better than 3 times of treatment.The number of treatments can be reduced appropriately under the condition that objective assessment indicators are effective.
作者
汪楠
李环
WANG Nan;LI Huan(Peking University Shenzhen Hospital Clinical Collage of Anhui Medical University,The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University,Shenzhen 518036,Guangdong Province,China)
出处
《罕少疾病杂志》
2023年第6期62-64,67,共4页
Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
基金
中国整形美容协会2019年“AI温控射频技术治疗盆底相关疾病的多中心临床试验”项目基金支持(FRPR2020-wksp-05)。
关键词
女性性功能障碍
阴道松弛症
射频
Female Sexual Dysfunction
Vaginal Laxity
Radio Frequency
