摘要
面对当代资本主义的新发展,阿瑟和普殊同均转向了对马克思“抽象劳动”的重构,这一重构将资本主义批判导向以“资本”为主体的社会结构批判,不仅扬弃了简单的阶级关系批判局限,也为当代资本主义批判奠定根基。二人的重构基于对黑格尔“实体一主体”的不同改造,分别从“内在对立”和“同构一体”把握资本这一“现实主体”,这导致他们在主体问题和解放路径上的根本不同。从理论视野来看,这根源于他们对劳动的“存在论”根基与其社会历史形式之关系的内在分歧;正是经由这一对照,二人各自的问题和内在困境才真实地凸显。
In the face of the new ddevelopment of contemporary capitalism,both Arthur and Postone turn to a reconstruction of Marx's"abstract labor",a reconstruction that directs the critique of capitalism to a critique of social structure with"capital"as the subject,not only abandoning the limits of a simple critique of class relations,but also laying the foundation for a contemporary critique of capitalism.Their reconstruction is based on different transformations of Hegel's"entitysubject",grasping capital as a"real subject"from"inner opposition"and"isomorphicunityr"espectively.This leads to a fundamental differencein their approaches to thesubject problem and emancipation.From a theoretical perspective,this is rooted in their inherent disagreement over the relationship between the"ontology"roots of labor and its socio-historical form;it is through this contrast that their respective problems and internal dilemmas are truly highlighted.
关键词
“抽象劳动”
价值形式
辩证法
二重中介
"abstract labor"
form of value
dialectics
diabolic mediation
