摘要
营业损失不宜借助间接损失或纯粹经济损失的概念直接确定其可赔偿性。营业权目前也不宜引入我国法封闭的民事权利体系。侵权行为直接造成营业损失时,应依《中华人民共和国民法典》第1165条认定责任成立与否,间接的营业损失应围绕第1184条,区分“计”与“算”分别讨论。经营性车辆受损时应采客观标准计算停运损失;经营性房屋受损时应认可承租人第停产停业损失的直接请求权。一般情况下,对妨害经营行为应区分类型认定被侵权人的赔偿请求权。间接营业损失应立足完全赔偿原则,结合“可预见性”分析其可赔偿性。
It is not appropriate to directly determine the compensability of business losses by means of the concepts of indirect losses or pure economic losses.It is also not appropriate to introduce the right of business into the civil rights system closed by Chinese civil law.When the infringement directly causes business losses,it should be determined whether the liability is established or not according to Article 1165 of the Civil Code,and indirect business losses should be discussed separately based on Article 1184,distinguishing between“count”and“calculation”.When a business vehicle is damaged,an objective standard shall be used to calcu⁃late the outage loss.When the business house is damaged,the lessee’s direct claim for the loss of production and business suspension shall be allowed.Under normal circumstances,the right to claim compensation for the infringed party should be determined according to the types of acts that impede business operations.Indi⁃rect business losses should be based on the principle of complete compensation and judge their compensabil⁃ity referring to“predictability”.
作者
安笑齐
AN Xiaoqi(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2023年第5期62-72,共11页
Journal of Yibin University
关键词
营业损失
停产停业损失
经营利润损失
损害赔偿
相当因果关系
可预见性
可得利益
business loss
loss of production and business suspension
loss of operating profit
compensation for damages
considerable causality
foreseeability
available benefits
