摘要
在单位犯罪中,自然人与单位系因同一危害行为受罚,在没有法定从轻事由时,对单位、自然人分开处理,对单位不起诉、对自然人判处刑罚的公平性令人质疑,这种做法似乎也不符合“双罚制”的要求。现有“双罚制”理论均以自然人的行为分析单位责任,却忽视了单位本身的可罚性所在。旧有的理论并没有联系单位犯罪客观实际。相比旧有理论,组织体刑事责任论指出了单位犯罪中单位和自然人各自的可谴责性所在,揭示了单位犯罪的实质,较好地解释了“双罚制”,应得到普遍认可。
In the unit crime,the natural person and the unit are responsible for the same act.Without mitigating circumstances,there's obvious doubt about the fairness that the unit accepts non-prosecution while the natural person is accused,which perhaps does not comply with the dual punishment system.The theory of dual punishment system bases on the natural person's behavior,ignoring the reality of the wrongdoing of the unit.The old theory does not consider the fact of unit crime.Compared with that,criminal liability of organization points out the different responsibilities of the unit and the natural person,and reveal the reality of unit crime,which interprets the dual punishment system properly.
作者
闫召华
陈硕明
Yan Zhaohua;Chen Shuoming(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing,China)
出处
《社会科学论坛》
2023年第3期140-151,共12页
Tribune of Social Sciences
基金
重庆市研究生科研创新项目《我国轻罪附随后果的制度困境及优化路径研究》阶段性成果,项目编号:CYS22291。
关键词
单位犯罪
双罚制
组织体刑事责任论
unit crime
dual punishment system
criminal liability of organization
