摘要
当前司法实践确立了“实质性替代”等商业数据反不正当竞争保护标准,日本、美国和欧盟也分别通过立法和司法实践形成了一定的商业数据保护规则。《反不正当竞争法(修订草案征求意见稿)》在当前司法实践基础上,借鉴国外相关制度经验形成了数据专条,规定了“破坏技术管理措施获取商业数据”和“实质性替代”使用商业数据两种不正当竞争行为类型。这两种不正当竞争类型所适用的商业数据范围、保护前提条件等存在差别,不宜统一适用于相同类型的商业数据。建议分别构建适用于仅提供给特定对象且采取技术管理措施的商业数据的“破坏技术管理措施”不正当获取商业数据规则,以及普遍适用于所有商业数据的以盗用理论为基础的“实质性替代”规则。
The current judicial practice has established standards such as"substantial substitution"for the anti-unfair competition protection of commercial data.In Japan,the United States and the European Union,certain commercial data protection rules have also been formed through legislation and judicial practice.The Chinese Anti-Unfair Competition Law(Revised Draft for Comments),based on the current judicial practice and the experience of relevant foreign systems,forms a special article on protection of commercial data,which stipulates two types of unfair competition behaviors of"obtaining commercial data by violating technical management measures"and"substantial substitution".There are differences between these two types of unfair competition on the scope of commercial data and the prerequisites for protection,so it is not appropriate for them to be uniformly applied to the same type of commercial data.It is recommended to make separately the rules of"violating technical management measures"for commercial data that are only available to specific entities and protected by technical management measures,and the"substantial substitution"rule based on the misappropriation theory,which applies generally to all commercial data.
出处
《知识产权》
北大核心
2023年第3期77-100,共24页
Intellectual Property
关键词
商业数据
实质性替代
盗用理论
技术管理措施
commercial data
substantial substitution
misappropriation
technical management measures
