期刊文献+

单亲鉴定的风险与应对 被引量:1

Parentage testing of duos:risks and responses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析单亲鉴定的风险并提出应对策略。方法首先使用无关个体对和近亲对的STR分型模拟单亲鉴定,分析存在的风险;然后计算代表性商品化试剂盒的单亲累积排除概率,度量风险大小;最后提出风险应对策略。结果单亲鉴定存在无关个体和近亲被错判为生父或生母的风险。使用含20~29个常染色体STR基因座的单个检测系统进行单亲鉴定易出现近亲错判。选择性加做基因座和比较近亲关系指数与亲权指数有助于识别近亲冒充,降低错判风险。结论为应对单亲鉴定的错判风险,建议根据鉴定情形检验合适类型和数量的遗传标记,同时比较近亲关系指数与亲权指数,并在鉴定意见中注明近亲干扰风险。 Objective To analyze the risks in the parentage testing of duos and to propose response strategies.Methods Firstly,parentage testing cases of duos were performed using short tandem repeat(STR)profiles of unrelated individual pairs and close relative pairs to analyze the potential risks.Then the combined probability of exclusion in duos was calculated for the representative commercial kits to determine the magnitude of risks.Finally,the risk response strategies were proposed.Results There was a risk that unrelated individuals and close relatives were falsely identified as biological fathers or mothers in the parentage testing of duos.Using a single detection system containing 20 to 29 autosomal STR loci was prone to misjudge.Selective addition of loci and comparison of the kinship indices for close relatives and paternity index were helpful to identify the impersonation and reduce the risks.Conclusion In order to reduce the misjudge risks in the parentage testing of duos,it is recommended to test appropriate type and number of genetic markers according to the identification scenario,to compare kinship indices for close relatives with paternity index,and to indicate the risk of interferences from close relatives in the identification opinion.
作者 陈茂敏 周凤蕾 黄代新 肖超 Chen Maomin;Zhou Fenglei;Huang Daixin;Xiao Chao(Department of Forensic Medicine,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
出处 《中国法医学杂志》 CSCD 2023年第2期148-154,共7页 Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费资助(HUST:2021XXJS114)。
关键词 法医物证学 单亲鉴定 短串联重复序列 风险 应对 Forensic genetics Parentage testing of duos Short tandem repeat Risk Response
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1[1]Ayres KL. Relatedness testing in subdivided populations [J].Forensic Sci Int, 2000, (114): 107 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Li CC, Sacks L. The derivation of joint distribution and correlation between relatives by the use of stochastic matrices [J].Biometrics, 1954, 10:347 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Chakraborty R. Considerations for interpreting DNA evidence involing relatives [C]. In:Statistics workshop. Scottsdale: Promega Corporation , 1996. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Wing KF. Statistical theory and software for mixtures and patemity testing based on STR loci [C]. In: National symposium of DNA typing for human identification. Beijing, 4 Dec.2000 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Evett IW, Weir BS. Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists [M]. Sunderling: Sinauer Associates Inc, 1998. 163 被引量:1
  • 6Thomson JA, Ayres KL, Pilotti V , et al. Analysis of disputed single-parent/child and sibling relationships using 16 STR loci [J]. Int J Legal Med, 2001, 115 (3): 128. 被引量:1
  • 7李海霞,孙宏钰,张何,陆惠玲,吕德坚.3个STR基因座同时突变的亲子鉴定案1例[J].法医学杂志,2009,25(4):319-320. 被引量:12
  • 8杨庆恩.亲子鉴定DNA分型亲权指数的简化计算法[J].中国法医学杂志,1998,13(2):90-92. 被引量:36
  • 9李海霞,孙宏钰,吴小洁,陆惠玲,童大跃,吕德坚.疑难亲子鉴定案1例[J].中国司法鉴定,2010(2):92-93. 被引量:3
  • 10伍新尧,杨庆恩,刘雅诚,陆惠玲,李生斌,李莉,刘超,吴微微,孙宏钰,朱运良,许冰莹,鲁涤.亲权鉴定判断标准和结论表述的建立[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2010,31(1):20-22. 被引量:23

共引文献125

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部