摘要
体育致害免责理论经历了运动伤害免责说、受害人自甘风险说和体育运动固有风险说三个发展阶段。我国《民法典》第1176条将自甘风险作为文体活动致害免责的一般性规则予以明确,但在具体案件的司法适用中需要明确一定风险的内涵,解构主观要件,修改不当的因果关系限制。此外,还需对观众自甘体育致害风险的观点持谨慎适用的态度。
The theory of sports injury exemption has gone through three stages:the theory of sports injury exemption,the theory of victim's own risk and the theory of sports inherent risk.Article 1176 of the Civil Code of China defines self-risk as a general rule of exempting harm from literary and sports activities,but in the judicial Application of specific cases,it is necessary to clarify the connotation of certain risks,deconstruct subjective conditions,and modify the undue limit of causality.In addition,there is still a need to be cautious about the perception that spectators bear the risk of sport injury.
出处
《湖南广播电视大学学报》
2023年第1期80-87,共8页
Journal of Hunan Radio and Television University
关键词
体育致害免责
《民法典》
自甘风险
固有风险
exemption of sports injury
Civil Code
assumption of risk
inherent risk
