摘要
生态环境损害赔偿诉讼制度与环境公益诉讼制度在诉讼主体、诉讼请求和适用范围等方面高度相似,实质上是一种竞合。实践中,两诉讼制度纠缠不清、衔接不畅导致不能很好地发挥各自效能。学界对于生态环境损害赔偿诉讼制度与环境公益诉讼制度的衔接存在“合并说”与“序位说”两种传统解法,两种学说各有千秋,但都未能很好地解决两制度的竞合问题。作为传统解法之外的“范围说”,能从源头上使两制度不再产生竞合,但作为新解法还需进一步完善内容。文章通过分析“范围说”的理论基础与两制度的适用范围,提出构建“分散+系统”的双重立法模式,并沿用“定义+列举”的形式来重新确定具体适用范围的建议。
The litigation system of eco-environmental damage compensation is highly similar to the litigation system of environment public interest in terms of litigation subjects,claims and scope of application,which is essentially a kind of co-opetition.In practice,the two litigation systems cannot play their respective functions effectively because of the entanglement and unsmooth connection.In the academic circle,there are two traditional solutions to the connection between the litigation system of eco-environmental damage compensation and the litigation system of environment public interest:the"merging theory"and the"sequencing theory".The two theories have their own merits,but neither of them can solve the problem of the co-opetition between the two systems well.As the"scope theory"besides the traditional solutions,it can make the two systems no longer produce co-opetition from the source,but as the new solution,it needs to be further improved.By analyzing the theoretical basis of the"scope theory"and the scope of application of the two systems,the paper puts forward the proposal of constructing a dual legislative model of"decentralization+system",and continues to use the form of"definition+enumeration"to redefine the specific scope of application.
作者
熊敏瑞
王玮
XIONG Minrui;WANG Wei(School of Law and Public Administration,China Three Gorges University,Yichang Hubei 443002,China)
出处
《中国国土资源经济》
2023年第4期30-36,共7页
Natural Resource Economics of China
基金
2020湖北省社科基金一般项目“分化与整合:乡村社会的公共性构建研究”(2020075)。
关键词
生态环境损害
损害赔偿诉讼
环境公益诉讼
竞合
合并说
序位说
范围说
eco-environmental damage
litigation for damage compensation
environment public interest litigation
co-opetition
merging theory
sequencing theory
scope theory
