摘要
当前中国南海法律维权证据群较为庞杂,而这会为证明中国对南海诸岛拥有主权,以及在南海拥有历史性所有权带来一定阻碍。在解决南海争端的过程中引入证据链学说,能够为建立证据优势提供逻辑工具,有助于补强证据的证明力与可信度,并有利于呈现南海争端证据的关系网络。在中国南海历史性所有权证据链中,需要明晰《更路簿》在证明“行使主权或主权性质权利”“持续行使权利”“法律确信”这三条证明路径中的价值。在中国南沙群岛主权证据链中,应具体考量《更路簿》在条约证据链、有效控制证据链以及地图证据链中的价值。在南海争端语境下,《更路簿》作为一项证据,需要突出其证明作用,找寻与其他证据之间的印证关系,并明确其证明力,更好地服务于证明“中国在南海拥有领土主权和海洋权益”这一使命。
At present,the evidences for protecting the legal rights in the South China Sea is quite complex,which will bring certain obstacles to proving China's sovereignty over the islands and historical title in the South China Sea.The introduction of the chain of evidence in the process of resolving disputes in the South China Sea can provide a logical tool for establishing preponderance of evidence,help strengthen the probative force and credibility of evidence and present the network of relationship of evidences in South China Sea disputes.In the chain of evidence of the historic title of the South China Sea,it is necessary to clarify the value of the Genglubu including exercising sovereignty or sovereign rights,the continuity of exercising the right and opinio juris.As regards to the chain of evidence of China’s sovereignty over the Nansha Islands,it is important to consider the value of Genglubu in chain of evidence within the international treaty,effective control and maps.In the context of the South China Sea dispute,Genglubu as a piece of evidence,it is necessary to highlight its probative role,find a corroborating relationship with other evidence,and clarify its probative capability,so as to better serve the mission of proving that China has territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea.
作者
刘思瑞
王琦
LIU Sirui;WANG Qi(Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China)
出处
《太平洋学报》
北大核心
2023年第2期95-106,共12页
Pacific Journal
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“百年南海疆文献资料的发掘与整理研究”(18ZDA193)
海南省研究生创新科研课题“证据链视角下《更路簿》南海法律维权价值研究”(Hyb2020-36)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
南海争端
证据链
更路簿
South China Sea Disputes
chain of evidence
Genglubu
