摘要
在新冠肺炎疫情下,《治安管理处罚法》第50条第1款第1项的“紧急状态条款”频繁适用,在一些地方有沦为“口袋罚”的趋向,公安机关在法政策下虚置裁量基准构成滥用职权,而宽泛适用行政拘留决定有违人权保障原则。治安管理处罚领域“紧急状态条款”的适用,应符合宪法的规定,因为该条款本身即沿袭宪法的规定,部门法应被置于宪法秩序之下。对治安管理处罚领域“紧急状态条款”实施合宪性控制,应通过合宪性解释使其与宪法概念保持统一,并在具体适用过程中贯彻处罚法定和人权保障原则。
Under the COVID-19 pandemic,the‘emergency clause’in Article 50(1)(a)of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law has been applied into practice frequently,it becomes the‘pocket penalties’,the public security organs are suspected of abusing the power by setting up discretionary standards under legal policies,and the extensive application of administrative detention violates the principle of human rights protection.The application of the‘emergency clause’in the Public Security Administration Punishment Law should accord with the provisions of the Constitution.Because this clause itself follows the provisions of the Constitution,the departmental laws should be subordinated to the constitutional order.The constitutional control scheme applicable to the‘emergency clause’in the Public Security Administration Punishment Law is to be unified with the constitutional concept through constitutional interpretation,and to reflect the principles of legal punishment and human rights protection in the specific application process.
出处
《苏州大学学报（法学版）》
CSSCI
2023年第1期98-107,共10页
Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“大数据、人工智能背景下的公安法治建设”(项目编号:19ZDA165)
国家社会科学基金青年项目“回应型治理视角下街镇综合执法改革的法治化研究”(项目编号:22CFX056)的阶段性成果。
关键词
治安管理处罚
紧急状态
合宪性解释
疫情防控
Public Security Management Punishment
Circumstance of Emergency
Constitutionality Faithful Interpretation
Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic
