摘要
法律实证主义是20世纪西方三大主要法学流派之一。新中国法律实证主义研究走过了政治性批判、复苏与本土尝试、兴盛与繁荣三个阶段,产出了丰硕的研究成果。新中国成立之初,受到特殊政治形势与苏联法学的影响,国内法律实证主义研究主要集中于对凯尔森的纯粹法学的批判。改革开放后,学界迎来理论研究的复苏,本土研究亦得到关注。进入21世纪,法律实证主义的翻译与理论研究工作实现全面发展,法律实证主义研究逐渐呈现出兴盛的景象。为进一步构建中国语境下的法律实证主义理论体系,实现理论的本土化,未来还应继续关注理论定位的科学性以及“中国法律理性图景”。
Legal positivism is one of the three main schools of law in the West in the 20th century. The research of legal positivism in new China has passed through three stages: political criticism, recovery and local attempts, flourishing and prosperity, and has produced fruitful research results. At the beginning of the founding of new China, under the influence of the special political situation and the Soviet jurisprudence, the domestic legal positivism research mainly takes Kelsen’s pure jurisprudence as the critical object. After the reform and opening up, the academic circle ushered in the revival of theoretical research, and local research also received attention. Entering the 21st century, the translation and theoretical research of legal positivism have achieved an all-round development, and the research of legal positivism has been flourishing gradually. In order to further construct the theoretical system of legal positivism in the Chinese context and realize the localization of the theory, people should continue to pay attention to the scientific orientation of the theory and the“rational picture of Chinese law”.
作者
贺梓恒
HE Ziheng(Administrative Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2023年第3期1-9,共9页
Journal of Yibin University
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“中国法理学研究70年回理与评析”(19AFX002)。
关键词
法律实证主义
政治性批判
系统化
多元化
本土化
legal positivism
political criticism
systematization
diversification
localization
