期刊文献+

连续性肾脏替代治疗对硫酸黏菌素血药浓度和临床疗效及安全性的影响 被引量:3

Effect of continuous renal replacement therapy on plasma concentration, clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)对硫酸黏菌素血药浓度、临床疗效及安全性的影响。方法:从本课题组前期临床注册研究,即硫酸黏菌素治疗重症监护病房(ICU)重症感染患者的有效性和药代动力学特点的前瞻性、多中心观察研究中,收集接受硫酸黏菌素治疗患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析,根据是否接受血液净化治疗将患者分为CRRT组和非CRRT组。收集两组患者的基线资料(性别、年龄、是否合并糖尿病、慢性神经系统疾病等)、一般资料(感染病原菌及部位、稳态谷浓度、稳态峰浓度、临床有效率,28 d全因病死率等)以及不良事件(肾功能损伤、神经症状、皮肤色素沉着等)。结果:共纳入90例患者,其中CRRT组22例,非CRRT组68例。①两组患者在性别、年龄、基础疾病、肝功能、感染病原菌、感染部位、硫酸黏菌素剂量等资料比较差异均无统计学意义。与非CRRT组相比,CRRT组患者急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)更高〔APACHEⅡ(分):21.77±8.26比18.01±6.34,P<0.05;SOFA(分):8.5(7.8,11.0)比6.0(4.0,9.0),P<0.01〕,血肌酐水平更高〔μmol/L:162.0(119.5,210.5)比72.0(52.0,117.0),P<0.01〕。②血药浓度:CRRT组与非CRRT组患者稳态谷浓度差异未见统计学意义(mg/L:0.58±0.30比0.64±0.25,P=0.328),稳态峰浓度差异也未见统计学意义(mg/L:1.02±0.37比1.18±0.45,P=0.133)。③临床疗效:CRRT组与非CRRT组临床有效率差异无统计学意义〔68.2%(15/22)比80.9%(55/68),P=0.213〕。④安全性:仅非CRRT组患者中有2例(2.9%)发生急性肾损伤;两组患者均未发现明显的神经系统症状以及皮肤色素沉着等不良反应。结论:CRRT对硫酸黏菌素药物的消除影响较小。对于接受CRRT治疗的患者,常规的血药浓度监测(TDM)是有必要的。 Objective To investigate the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT)on plasma concentration,clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate.Methods Clinical data of patients received with colistin sulfate were retrospectively analyzed from our group's previous clinical registration study,which was a prospective,multicenter observation study on the efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics of colistin sulfate in patients with severe infection in intensive care unit(ICU).According to whether patients received blood purification treatment,they were divided into CRRT group and non-CRRT group.Baseline data(gender,age,whether complicated with diabetes,chronic nervous system disease,etc),general data(infection of pathogens and sites,steady-state trough concentration,steady-state peak concentration,clinical efficacy,28-day all-cause mortality,etc)and adverse event(renal injury,nervous system,skin pigmentation,etc)were collected from the two groups.Results A total of 90 patients were enrolled,including 22 patients in the CRRT group and 68 patients in the non-CRRT group.①There was no significant difference in gender,age,basic diseases,liver function,infection of pathogens and sites,colistin sulfate dose between the two groups.Compared with the non-CRRT group,the acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)and sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)were higher in the CRRT group[APACHEⅡ:21.77±8.26 vs.18.01±6.34,P<0.05;SOFA:8.5(7.8,11.0)vs.6.0(4.0,9.0),P<0.01],serum creatinine level was higher[μmol/L:162.0(119.5,210.5)vs.72.0(52.0,117.0),P<0.01].②Plasma concentration:there was no significant difference in steady-state trough concentration between CRRT group and non-CRRT group(mg/L:0.58±0.30 vs.0.64±0.25,P=0.328),nor was there significant difference in steady-state peak concentration(mg/L:1.02±0.37 vs.1.18±0.45,P=0.133).③Clinical efficacy:there was no significant difference in clinical response rate between CRRT group and non-CRRT group[68.2%(15/22)vs.80.9%(55/68),P=0.213].④
作者 彭丹阳 张帆 李兆桢 吕品 郭孜琦 陈银银 赵婧革 牛京京 郭波 贾文青 姜晓锋 李晓召 祁绍艳 秦秉玉 邵换璋 Peng Danyang;Zhang Fan;Li Zhaozhen;Lyu Pin;Guo Ziqi;Chen Yinyin;Zhao Jingge;Niu Jingjing;Guo Bo;Jia Wenqing;Jiang Xiaofeng;Li Xiaozhao;Qi Shaoyan;Qin Bingyu;Shao Huanzhang(Department of Critical Care Medicine,People's Hospital of Henan University,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,Henan Provincial People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Henan Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Pharmacy,Henan Provincial People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Clinical Research Center,Henan Province People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Neurology,Henan Provincial People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Cardiac Surgecal Intensive Care Unit,Henan Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China)
出处 《中华危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期88-92,共5页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 河南省自然科学基金面上项目(202300410458)。
关键词 硫酸黏菌素 血药浓度 连续性肾脏替代治疗 临床有效率 不良反应 Colistin sulfate Plasma concentration Continuous renal replacement therapy Clinical efficacy Adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1王鸣,彭炜,蔡敏,季刚.外科重症监护室645例脓毒症患者临床流行病学调查[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(2):74-77. 被引量:31
  • 2Chertow GM, Levy EM, Hammermeister KE, et al. Independent association between acute renal failure and mortality following cardiac surgery [ J ]. Am J Med, 1995,104 (4) : 343-348. 被引量:1
  • 3Escoresca Ortega AM, Ruiz de Az6a L6pez Z, Hinojosa Perez R, et al. Kidney failure after heart transplantation [ J ]. Transplant Proc,2010,42 (8) : 3193-3195. 被引量:1
  • 4Silvester W, Bellomo R, Cole L. Epidemiology, management, and outcome of severe acute renal failure of critical illness in Australia [ J ]. Crit Care Med,2001,29 (10) : 1910-1915. 被引量:1
  • 5Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, et al. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients:clinical characteristics and outcomes [ J ]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2007,2 (3) : 431-439. 被引量:1
  • 6Wang X, Jie Yuan W. Timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury : a systematic review and meta- analysis [ J ]. Ren Fail,2012,34 (3) : 396-402. 被引量:1
  • 7Kellum JA, Angus DC, Johnson JP, et al. Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy : a recta-analysis [ J ]. Intensive Care Med,2002,28 ( 1 ) : 29-37. 被引量:1
  • 8Chon GR, Chang JW, Huh JW, et al. A comparison of the time from sepsis to inception of continuous renal replacement therapy versus RIFLE criteria in patients with septic acute kidney injury [ J ]. Shock,2012,38 ( 1 ) : 30-36. 被引量:1
  • 9Shum HP, Chan KC. Timing for initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury [ J ]. Ther Apher Dial,2013,17 (6) : 643. 被引量:1
  • 10Chou YH, Huang TM, Wu VC, et al. Impact of timing of renal replacement therapy initiation on outcome of septic acute kidney injury [J]. Crit Care,2011,15 (3) : R134. 被引量:1

共引文献90

同被引文献15

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部