期刊文献+

小规模限制性在线课程联合研讨会教学在高级护理实践课程中的应用 被引量:5

Application effect of SPOC combined seminar teaching in Advanced Nursing Practice course for postgraduates of master of nursing specialist
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨小规模限制性在线课程(small private online course,SPOC)联合研讨会教学在护理硕士专业学位研究生高级护理实践课程中的应用效果。方法选取某校2020级护理硕士专业学位研究生作为研究对象,按班级分为对照组(n=33)和试验组(n=29)。试验组采用SPOC联合研讨会教学,对照组采用传统教学。分别在课前和课后采用批判性思维能力测量表评价两组的评判性思维能力;比较两组的理论测试和综合报告成绩、教学质量评价和教学满意度。结果教学后,试验组评判性思维能力得分(300.97±26.45)高于对照组(283.67±17.39),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组综合报告成绩高于对照组(P<0.05),对教学质量的评价高于对照组(P<0.05),在“有助于提高临床问题分析能力”和“有助于提高临床护理能力”2个方面的满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论高级护理实践课程中应用SPOC联合研讨会教学法可以有效提高护理硕士专业学位研究生的评判性思维能力,提高学习效果、教学质量和教学满意度。 Objective To explore the application effect of SPOC combined seminar teaching in the Advanced Nursing Practice course for postgraduates of master of nursing specialist(MNS).Methods The MNS students were divided into the control group(n=33)and the experimental group(n=29)according to their class.The experimental group employed SPOC combined seminar teaching,while the control group used traditional teaching.The critical thinking ability of the two groups was evaluated by the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory before and after the teaching respectively.Besides,the theoretical test and comprehensive report scores,teaching quality evaluation and teaching satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results After teaching,the critical thinking ability score of the experimental group(300.97±26.45)was higher than that of the control group(283.67±17.39),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Similarly,the score on the comprehensive report and the evaluation of teaching quality of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).In addition,the satisfaction of the experimental group in the two aspects of“helping to improve clinical problem analysis ability”and“helping to improve clinical nursing ability”was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of SPOC combined seminar teaching method in Advanced Nursing Practice courses can effectively improve the critical thinking ability among postgraduates of MNS,and enhance the learning effect,teaching quality as well as students’satisfaction toward teaching.
作者 鲜雪梅 乔世娜 赵林芳 胡贝贝 胡宏鸯 袁红娣 钱颖 蒋小芳 叶志弘 XIAN Xuemei;QIAO Shina;ZHAO Linfang;HU Beibei;HU Hongyang;YUAN Hongdi;QIAN Ying;JIANG Xiaofang;YE Zhihong
出处 《中华护理教育》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期169-173,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
基金 浙江大学研究生教育研究课题一般项目(20210403)。
关键词 教育 护理 研究生 高级护理实践 小规模限制性在线课程 研讨会 Education,Nursing,Graduate Advanced nursing practice Small private online course Seminar
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 2Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 3Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90. 被引量:1
  • 4Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132. 被引量:1
  • 5Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229. 被引量:1
  • 6Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304. 被引量:1
  • 7Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186. 被引量:1
  • 8Biggs J. Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In: Watkins DA, Biggs JB, eds. The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Australia: CERC and ACER, 1996. 45-67. 被引量:1
  • 9American Philosophical Association. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy(ER 被引量:1
  • 10Pang MCS, Wong TKS, Ho SCJ. Changing economics and health worker training in modern China. The Yale-China Health Journal, 2002, 1: 61-84. 被引量:1

共引文献1829

同被引文献52

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部