期刊文献+

颈动脉支架植入术后闭环健康教育护理对患者自我管理的影响效果

Impact effect of closed-loop health education and nursing on patients’self-management after carotid artery stent implantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察分析闭环健康教育护理对颈动脉支架植入术后患者自我管理的影响效果。方法选取2019年1月至2021年12月在江苏省无锡市人民医院神经内科住院的80例患者,按照随机数表法分为对照组(n=40)和干预组(n=40)。出院前到出院后6个月期间,对照组采取常规护理健康教育,干预组实施闭环健康教育护理干预,6个月后,比较两组患者术后自我管理行为能力及并发症发生率。结果干预组患者的自我管理行为能力评分较干预前明显增长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),干预组患者日常生活管理量表得分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),干预组并发症总发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论闭环健康教育护理能够有效提升颈动脉支架植入术后患者在日常生活、疾病医学和情绪认知方面的自我管理能力,降低并发症发生率。 Objective To observe and analyze the impact effect of closed-loop health education and nursing on patients’self-management after carotid artery stent implantation.Methods A total of 80 patients hospitalized in the Department of Neurology in Wuxi People’s Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected,and they were divided into the control group(n=40)and the intervention group(n=40)according to the random number table method.During the period from before discharge to 6 months after discharge,the control group was treated with conventional nursing health education,while the intervention group was treated with closed-loop health education and nursing intervention.After 6 months,the ability of postoperative self-management behavior and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups of patients.Results The scores of self-management behavior scale in the intervention group were significantly higher than those at discharge,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The scores on daily life management scale in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).And the total incidence of complications in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Closed-loop health education and nursing can effectively improve the self-management ability of patients after carotid artery stent implantation in daily life,disease medicine and emotional cognition,and reduce the incidence of complications.
作者 谢丽娜 陈维艳 戴征 XIE Lina;CHEN Weiyan;DAI Zheng(Department of Neurology,Wuxi People’s Hospital of Jiangsu Province,Jiangsu,Wuxi 214023,China)
出处 《中国医药科学》 2023年第4期110-113,共4页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
基金 江苏省无锡市卫生健康委科研项目(M202142)。
关键词 颈动脉支架植入术 闭环健康教育护理 自我管理 情绪认知管理 Carotid artery stent implantation Closed-loop health education and nursing Self-management Emotional cognitive management
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献89

  • 1董湘萍,徐朝霞,张岚,景艳红,文世全.预见性护理在依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死中的应用及对患者NIHSS评分的影响[J].中国全科医学,2019,0(S02):208-210. 被引量:32
  • 2Farics PI, Chacr RA, Patel S,et al. current in anagement of extracrani- al carotid aretey disease [ J ]. Vascular and Endovascular surgery, 2006,40(3 ) :165-175. 被引量:1
  • 3凌锋,廖中荣.缺廊性脑血管病介入治疗学[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2003:92-115. 被引量:1
  • 4Massop D, Dave R, Metzger C, et al. Stenting and angioplasty with pro- tectionin patients at high risk for endarterectomy SAPPHIREW or wide Registry first 2001 patients [ J ]. Cathete Cardiovasc Interv,2009,73 (2) :129-136. 被引量:1
  • 5Wiesmann M, Schopf V, Jansen O, et al. Stent-proteeted angio-plasty versus carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trial data[ J ]. Eur Radio1,2008,18( 12 ) : 2956 -2966. 被引量:1
  • 6Murad MH, Flynn DN, Elamin MB,et al. Endarterectomy vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[ J ]. Vase Surg,2008,48 ( 2 ) :487-493. 被引量:1
  • 7Roubin GS, Iyer S, Halkin A, et al. Realizing the potential ecamtidar- tery stenting:proposed paradigms for patient selection and procedural technique [ J ]. Circulation ,2006,113 ( 12 ) :2021-2030. 被引量:1
  • 8SPACE Collaborative Group, Ringleb RA, Allenberg J, et al. 30-day re- suits from the SPACE t-rial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carot- id endarterectomy in symptomatic patients:arandomized non-inferiority trial [ J ]. Lancet,2006,368 ( 9543 ) : 1239-1247. 被引量:1
  • 9EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy vs. Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis ( EVA-3S ) trial [ J ]. Cerebrovasc Dis,2004,18( 1 ) :622-651. 被引量:1
  • 10漆君,刘建仁,晁明,丁美萍,黄鉴政,武建军,张广强,孙继红,宋水江,张宝荣,陈伟,李慎茂.高危颈动脉狭窄的球囊扩张和支架植入术治疗[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2007,36(4):401-405. 被引量:1

共引文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部