期刊文献+

飞轮离心超负荷训练与传统力量训练对运动员的运动表现影响比较的Meta分析 被引量:1

Meta Analysis of Comparison between Flywheel Eccentric Overload Training and Traditional Strength Training on Athletes’Performance Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:运用Meta分析的方法比较飞轮离心超负荷训练(FEOT)与传统力量训练(TST)对运动员纵跳能力、短距离直线冲刺能力和变向能力的干预有效性。方法:检索CNKI、Wanfang Data、Web of Science、PubMed、Elsevier、EBSCO-MEDLINE等数据库中关于FEOT干预运动表现的随机对照试验文献,采用软件“Review Manager 5.4”对纳入文献进行方法学质量评价、异质性分析及亚组分析,采用软件“Stata/SE 15.1”对纳入文献进行发表性偏倚分析及敏感性分析。结果:Meta分析结果显示,FEOT比TST更能有效地提高纵跳高度(MD=0.31,95%CI[0.11,0.51],p=0.001),缩短变向测试用时(SMD=-0.71,95%CI[-1.01,-0.42],p<0.01);FEOT可以缩短短距离直线冲刺用时,但无统计学意义(SMD=-0.04,95%CI[-0.34,0.27],p=0.081)。结论:飞轮离心超负荷训练比传统力量训练更能有效地提高受试者纵跳能力和变向能力、提高成年运动员短距离直线冲刺能力,而对青少年运动员短距离直线冲刺能力提升效果不明显;飞轮离心超负荷训练与传统力量训练在中等惯量和大惯量、与特定运动表现的力的矢量方向相近或相同的训练具有良好的干预效果。 Objective:To compare the effectiveness of flywheel eccentric overload training(FEOT)and traditional strength training(TST)on athletes’vertical jump,short straight sprint and directional change ability by using the method of meta-analysis.Methods:The randomized controlled trials of FEOT on exercise performance intervention in CNKI,Wanfang Data,Web of Science,PubMed,Elsevier,EBSCO-MEDLINE and other databases were retrieved.The methodological quality evaluation,heterogeneity analysis and subgroup analysis of the included literatures were performed using“Review Manager 5.4”software,and the publication bias analysis and sensitivity analysis of the included literatures were performed using“Stata/SE 15.1”software.Results:Meta analysis showed that FEOT was more effective than TST in increasing the vertical jump height(MD=0.31,95%CI[0.11,0.51],p=0.001),and reducing the time for directional change test(SMD=-0.71,95%CI[-0.01,-0.42],p<0.01);FEOT could reduce the time for short straight sprint,but it had no statistical significance(SMD=-0.04,95%CI[-0.34,0.27],p=0.081).Conclusion:Compared with traditional strength training,flywheel eccentric overload training can effectively improve the vertical jump and directional change ability of subjects,and enhance the short distance straight sprint ability of adult athletes,but it has no obvious effect on the short distance straight sprint ability of young athletes;flywheel eccentric overload training and traditional strength training have good intervention effect in the training design with medium and high inertia load,similar or the same direction as the force vector of specific sports performance.
作者 李文华 李春雷 吴晓妹 丁乾 LI Wenhua;LI Chunlei;WU Xiaomei;DING Qian(Shenyang Sport University,Shenyang,Liaoning 110102,China;Institute of Physical Training,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100084,China.)
出处 《首都体育学院学报》 北大核心 2023年第1期86-99,共14页 Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(19BTY104) 2019年河北省技术创新引导计划科技冬奥专项(19975705D)。
关键词 飞轮 离心超负荷训练 传统力量训练 纵跳 冲刺 变向 元分析 flywheel eccentric overload training traditional strength training vertical jump sprint change of direction meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1刘嘉湘,施志明,徐振晔,韩明权,朱晏伟,高虹,陈善香,赵丽红,李和根,朱惠蓉,刘苓霜.滋阴生津益气温阳法治疗晚期原发性肺腺癌的临床研究[J].中医杂志,1995,36(3):155-158. 被引量:151
  • 2Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith. Douglas Ahman. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysls in context, 2^nd ed[M]. London: BMJ Books, 2001. 363-364. 被引量:1
  • 3Light R J, Pillemer DB. Summing up: the science of reviewing research[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. 13. 被引量:1
  • 4Begg C B, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias [J]. Biometrics, 1994, 50 (4) : 1088-1099. 被引量:1
  • 5Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J]. BMJ, 1997, 315: 629- 634. 被引量:1
  • 6Jonathan A C Sterne, Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith. Systematic review in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other bias in meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2001, 323: 101- 105. 被引量:1
  • 7Taylor S J, Tweedie RI. Practical estimates of the effect of publication bias in meta-analysis[J]. Australasian Epidemiologist, 1998, 5: 14-17. 被引量:1
  • 8Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith. Meta-analysis bias in loca- tion and selection of studies[J]. BMJ 1998, 316: 61-66. 被引量:1
  • 9Jadad AR,Cook DJ,Browman GP. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews[J]. CMAJ,1997,156(10):1411-6. 被引量:1
  • 10Dixon E,Hameed M,Sutherland F,et al. Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal[J]. Ann Surg,2005,241(3):450-9. 被引量:1

共引文献136

同被引文献43

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部