期刊文献+

DRG相对权重调整的思考和启示 被引量:8

Reflections and Insights on the Adjustment of DRG Relative Weights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:确定合理的DRG相对权重,确保DRG系统的有效性和公平性。方法:通过文献分析,梳理国内外DRG相对权重谈判现状,以S市为例,介绍我国DRG权重谈判的过程。结果:我国DRG权重谈判仍在学习探索阶段,各统筹区制度建设不健全,未建立成本核算体系,权重调整政策不够完善,临床数据质量不高。结论:各统筹区应加强数据质量监管,建立长期、动态的相对权重更新和调整机制,以及以医疗成本为基础的专家谈判机制和成本核算体系,积极研究相对权重调整方法并出台统一的权重调整方案。 Objective To determine a reasonable DRG relative weight to ensure the effectiveness and fairness of the DRG system.Methods Through literature analysis,the current situation of DRG relative weight negotiation at home and abroad was sorted out.This study took S city as an example to introduce the process of DRG weight negotiation in China.Results DRG weight negotiation in China is still at the stage of learning and exploring,the system construction of each co-ordinating district is not sound,no cost accounting system has been established,the weight adjustment policy is not perfect,and the quality of clinical data is not high.Conclusion Each coordinating region should strengthen data quality supervision,establish a long-term and dynamic mechanism for updating and adjusting relative weights,as well as an expert negotiation mechanism and cost accounting system based on medical costs,actively study relative weight adjustment methods and introduce a unified weight adjustment scheme.
作者 李婵 邹佳 徐焦 李璠 LI Chan;ZOU Jia;XU Jiao;LI Fan(School of Pharmaceutical Science and Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products,Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650500,China)
出处 《卫生经济研究》 北大核心 2023年第1期46-48,52,共4页
基金 云南省药物政策研究中心课题项目“以医保药品政策为抓手促进云南省生物医药产业发展路径研究”(2020YNPP001)。
关键词 疾病诊断相关分组 相对权重 权重谈判 动态调整 Diagnosis Related groups relative weight weight negotiation dynamic adjustment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献84

  • 1张锦平,赵敏,张春宏,王高伟,桂艳丽,徐学斌.DRGs在肿瘤专科医院医疗质量管理中的应用[J].中国病案,2020,0(1):25-27. 被引量:9
  • 2李滔,张帆.德国医疗卫生体制改革现状与启示[J].中国卫生经济,2015,34(4):92-96. 被引量:15
  • 3姚伟飚.谈美国DRG管理制度及在我国军队医疗成本核算中的发展[J].会计之友,2007(04S):37-38. 被引量:2
  • 4Jonas Schrey?gg,Tom Stargardt,Oliver Tiemann,Reinhard Busse.Methods to determine reimbursement rates for diagnosis related groups (DRG): A comparison of nine European countries[J].Health Care Management Science.2006(3) 被引量:1
  • 5Cots,F,Elvira,D,Castells,X,Dalmau,E.Medicare’s DRG-weights in a European environment: the Spanish experience[].Health Policy.2000 被引量:1
  • 6Phelan,PD,Tate,R,Webster,F,Marshall,RP.DRG cost weights—getting it right[].Medical Journal of Australia.1998 被引量:1
  • 7Jackson,T.Using computerised patient-level costing data for setting DRG weights: the Victorian (Australia) cost weight studies[].Health Policy.2001 被引量:1
  • 8Scarpaci JL.DRG calculation and utilization patterns:a re-view of method and policy[].Social Science and Medicine.1988 被引量:1
  • 9BL MEL M, BUSSE R. The German health care system, 2014 [M]// MOSSIALOS E, WENZL M, OSBORN R, et al. Interna- tional profiles of health care systems. New York: The Com- monwealth Fund, 2015. 被引量:1
  • 10QUENTIN W, GEISSLER A, SCHELLER-KREINSEN D, et al. DRG-type hospital payment in Germany: The G-DRG system[J]. Euro observer, 2010,12(3): 4-6. 被引量:1

共引文献187

同被引文献93

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部