摘要
通过拆解托马斯·霍布斯政治学经典《利维坦》中的逻辑修辞结构,借助于文化传播学“编码解码”理论,本文重点对比分析黎思复译本、陆道夫译本在主导、协商、对抗三种解码方式上的差异及其缘由,试图为经典的重译、复译提供新的翻译策略与路径。研究结果表明:黎译以主导-霸权式解码为主,陆译则侧重于主导式解码、协商式解码两种方式。译者不同的解码方式,产生了不同的译文传播效果和读者体验,多种解码方式的灵活运用,不仅能够给以后的经典著作英译带来新的启发和尝试,而且还会让目标语读者有更多更愉悦的版本选择。
By deconstructing the logical-rhetorical structure of Thomas Hobbes’ political classic Leviathan, and with the help of the theory of “encoding and decoding” in cultural communication, this paper focuses on the differences and reasons of the three decoding positions: dominant-hegemonic position, negotiated position, oppositional position, in the translations by LI Sifu and by LU Daofu. The paper attempts to provide new translation strategies and paths for the retranslation of classics. The study shows that the LI’s translation is dominated by the dominant-hegemonic decoding, while the LU focuses on both dominant-hegemonic and negotiated decoding. The flexible use of multiple decoding approaches will not only bring new inspirations and experiments to future English translations of classical works, but also provide the target readers with more pleasant versions to choose from.
作者
陆道夫
王影
LU Dao-fu;WANG Ying(School of Advanced Translation,Jilin University of Foreign Studies,Changchun 130117,Jilin;Institute of New Rural Development,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230000,Anhui)
出处
《阜阳师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第6期35-42,共8页
Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science
基金
2018年教育部人文社科规划基金项目“跨文化交际伦理规范构建研究”(18YJA740017)。
