摘要
关于比较宪法的国际讨论已经见证了经验研究的繁荣。本文旨在对这一趋势进行盘点。本文审视了这一领域的最新文献,讨论了经验研究在宪法学中的潜力和陷阱。在介绍了经验法学研究的方法及其面临的挑战后,本文聚焦于两个研究领域。首先,本文描述和评估了有关宪法设计的研究;其次,本文分析了有关最高层级的法院如何作出司法裁判的文献。本文的结论是,有关司法裁判的研究在方法论上比宪法设计的研究更成熟。当审视了后者所存在的方法论上的缺陷后,本文也认为相关研究对于学术讨论作出了重要贡献,从而尝试提出未来发展的一些建议。
The international discussion on comparative constitutional law has witnessed the prosperity of empirical research.This article aims to take stock of this trend.This paper examines the latest literature in this field and discusses the potential and pitfalls of empirical research in constitutional law.After introducing the methods and challenges of empirical law research,this paper focuses on two research areas.First,this paper describes and evaluates the research on constitutional design.Secondly,this paper analyzes the literature on how the highest level courts make judicial decisions.The conclusion of this paper is that the research on judicial adjudication is more mature in methodology than the research on constitutional design.After reviewing the methodological defects of the latter,this paper also believes that relevant research has made an important contribution to the academic discussion,so as to try to put forward some suggestions for future development.
出处
《南大法学》
2023年第1期172-193,共22页
NanJing University Law Journal
基金
国家重点研发计划“立法公众意见综合分析及法律条文智能审查技术研究”(2021YFC3340300,2021YFC3340304)的阶段性成果
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目《反歧视立法的宪法问题研究》(19SFB2010)的阶段性成果。
关键词
经验研究
比较宪法
宪法设计
宪法裁判
法教义学
Empirical Research
Comparative Constitutional Law
Constitutional Design
Constitutional Decisions
Legal Doctrine
