摘要
目的:构建医疗设备资产管理多维绩效评价模式,探讨其在医疗设备资产管理中的应用价值。方法:选取医院临床在用的482台医疗设备,按照绩效评价管理模式不同将其分为对照组(408台)和观察组(449台,包含对照组在用的375台和新增加的74台),对照组采用主观绩效评价管理模式;观察组采用多维绩效评价管理模式,从设备的配置论证、采购验收、使用维护和升级报废等维度构建绩效指标进行设备干预管理。对比两组设备的绩效评价、运行质量及管理费用支出的差异。结果:观察组医疗设备的配置论证、采购验收、使用维护和升级报废绩效评分分别为(90.25±5.54)分、(92.05±5.52)分、(92.84±3.86)分和(92.35±3.64)分,均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.068,t=4.133,t=5.507,t=4.633;P<0.05);观察组设备的开机率和运转率分别为(94.13±3.75)%和(88.57±5.14)%,均高于对照组,改造率和报废率分别为(0.33±0.24)%和(0.52±0.30)%,均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.095,t=2.438,t=2.486,t=2.889;P<0.05);观察组医用电子仪器、医学检验仪器、手术室设备、生命支持设备、康复医学设备、医学影像设备及其他设备的相对费用支出增幅分别为(2.04±0.97)%、(1.69±0.81)%、(1.72±0.59)%、(1.24±0.65)%、(2.01±0.52)%、(2.48±0.63)%和(1.89±0.47)%,均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.213,t=2.773,t=4.609,t=3.047,t=5.682,t=6.424,t=6.207;P<0.05)。结论:多维绩效评价模式能够改善医疗设备的临床服务绩效,提高医疗设备临床运行质量,控制医疗设备管理费用支出。
Objective:To construct a multidimensional performance evaluation model of medical equipment asset management and explore its application value in medical equipment asset management.Methods:482 sets of medical equipment in clinical use were selected and divided into control group(408 sets)and observation group(449 sets,including 375 sets in the control group and 74 sets newly added)according to different performance evaluation management modes.The control group adopted subjective performance evaluation management mode.The observation group adopted multidimensional performance evaluation management mode to construct performance indicators from the dimensions of allocation demonstration,procurement acceptance,use and maintenance,upgrade and scrap for equipment intervention management.The difference of performance evaluation,operation quality and management cost between the two groups of equipment were compared.Results:The performance of allocation demonstration,purchase acceptance,use and maintenance and upgrade scrap of medical equipment in the observation group were(90.25±5.54)points,(92.05±5.52)points,(92.84±3.86)points and(92.35±3.64)points,respectively,which were higher than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(t=3.068,t=4.133,t=5.507,t=4.633;P<0.05).The start-up rate and operating rate of the equipment in the observation group were(94.13±3.75)%and(88.57±5.14)%,respectively,both of which were higher than those in the control group,the retrofit rate and scrap rate were(0.33±0.24)%and(0.52±0.30)%,respectively,both which were lower than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(t=2.095,t=2.438,t=2.486,t=2.889;P<0.05).The relative cost increases of medical electronic equipment,medical laboratory equipment,operating room equipment,life support equipment,rehabilitation medical equipment,medical imaging equipment and other equipment in the observation group were(2.04±0.97)%,(1.69±0.81)%,(1.72±0.59)%,(1.24±0.65)%,(2.01±052)%,(2.48+0.63)%and(1
作者
杨柳
陈雪
邹紫瑶
芦铭
YANG Liu;CHEN Xue;ZOU Zi-yao(Asset Management Office,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Beijing 100035,China;不详)
出处
《中国医学装备》
2022年第12期166-170,共5页
China Medical Equipment
关键词
资产管理
多维绩效评价模式
全程管理
绩效评价
Asset management
Multidimensional performance evaluation model
Whole-process management
