摘要
Purpose:To compare the stability of the posterior anatomic self-locking plate(PASP)with two types of popular reconstruction plate fixation,i.e.double reconstruction plate(DRP)and cross reconstruction plate(CRP),and to explore the influence of sitting and turning right/left on implants.Methods:PASP,DRP and CRP were assembled on a finite element model of both-column fractures of the left acetabulum.A load of 600 N and a torque of 8 N·m were loaded on the S1 vertebral body to detect the change of stress and displacement when sitting and turning right/left.Results:The peak stress and displacement of the three kinds of fixation methods under all loading conditions were CRP>DRP>PASP.The peak stress and displacement of PASP are 313.5 MPa and 1.15 mm respectively when turning right;and the minimal was 234.0 Mpa and 0.619 mm when turning left.Conclusion:PASP can provide higher stability than DRP and CRP for both-column acetabular fractures.The rational movement after posterior DRP and PASP fixation for acetabular fracture is to turn to the ipsilateral side,which can avoid implant failure.
