期刊文献+

衰弱亚型对老年胃癌患者不良结局的影响研究 被引量:4

Preoperative Frailty and Postoperative Adverse Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景老年胃癌患者在生理、心理、社会等方面均存在较大的异质性,可能导致不同维度的衰弱发生,形成不同的衰弱亚型,其术前各衰弱亚型对术后不良结局的影响有待探讨。目的探究老年胃癌患者术前各衰弱亚型对不良结局(总并发症、住院时间延长、生活质量低下及失能)的影响。方法采用便利抽样法,于2021年3—10月选取南京医科大学第一附属医院胃外科404例老年胃癌患者为研究对象,在术前采用一般资料调查表、Tilburg衰弱量表对其进行调查,通过电子病历系统收集患者总并发症和住院时间,术后1个月通过电话随访收集生活质量和失能信息。采用单因素Logistic回归分析探讨老年胃癌患者不良结局的影响因素。调整潜在的混杂因素后,使用多因素Logistic回归分析探讨不同衰弱亚型对老年胃癌患者不良结局的影响。结果404例老年胃癌患者术前衰弱分为8个衰弱亚型:仅生理衰弱77例(19.1%)、仅心理衰弱78例(19.3%)、仅社会衰弱23例(5.7%)、生理与心理衰弱63例(15.6%)、生理与社会衰弱13例(3.2%)、心理与社会衰弱16例(4.0%)、多维衰弱(生理、心理与社会衰弱)15例(3.7%)、非衰弱119例(29.5%)。单因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄为老年胃癌患者总并发症的影响因素[OR=1.063,95%CI(1.021,1.106),P=0.003];药物服用史[OR=1.549,95%CI(1.016,2.362),P=0.042]、手术方式[OR=2.103,95%CI(1.191,3.712),P=0.010]为老年胃癌患者住院时间延长的影响因素;婚姻状况[OR=4.611,95%CI(1.079,19.706),P=0.039]、居住地为城市[OR=1.614,95%CI(1.009,2.582),P=0.046]、合并慢性病数量≥2种[OR=1.694,95%CI(1.038,2.766),P=0.035]为老年胃癌患者低生活质量的影响因素;居住地为城市[OR=0.601,95%CI(0.390,0.926),P=0.021]、药物服用史[OR=1.663,95%CI(1.082,2.558),P=0.020]、胃癌TNM分期Ⅲ期及以上[OR=1.659,95%CI(1.017,2.706),P=0.043]为老年胃癌患者失能的影响因素。多因素Logistic回� Background Due to great differences in physiological reserve,psychological status and social functioning,frailty in elderly patients with gastric cancer may present various subtypes.The relationship between preoperative frailty and postoperative adverse outcomes in them still remains to be further explored.Objective To explore the relationship between preoperative frailty subtypes and postoperative adverse outcomes[total complications,prolonged length of stay(PLOS),low quality of life(QOL),and disability]among elderly patients with gastric cancer.Methods From March to October 2021,404 elderly gastric cancer patients were selected from Department of Gastric Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University by convenience sampling.The General Demographic Data Questionnaire and Tilburg Frailty Indicator were used to collect demographics and frailty status before surgery.Total complications and PLOS were collected from the electronic medical records,and the status of disability and QOL were obtained using a telephone follow-up at one month after discharge.Univariate Logistic regression was performed to explore the influencing factors of postoperative adverse outcomes.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the association of preoperative frailty subtypes with postoperative adverse outcomes,with potential confounders adjusted.Results Two hundred and eighty-five cases were found with preoperative frailty,and the frailty subtypes in them were classified into eight classes:exclusive physical frailty[77(19.1%)],exclusive psychological frailty[78(19.3%)],exclusive social frailty[23(5.7%)],physical and psychological frailty[63(15.6%)],physical and social frailty[13(3.2%)],psychological and social frailty[16(4.0%)],multidimensional frailty(physical,psychological,and social frailty)[15(3.7%)].The other 119(29.5%)cases had no preoperative frailty.In the univariate Logistic regression,age was the factor influencing total complications[OR=1.063,95%CI(1.021,1.106),P=0.003].History of
作者 缪雪怡 丁玲玉 陆金玲 胡洁蔓 朱涵菲 陈丽 徐欣怡 许勤 MIAO Xueyi;DING Lingyu;LU Jinling;HU Jieman;ZHU Hanfei;CHEN Li;XU Xinyi;XU Qin(School of Nursing,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211166,China;Department of Gastric Surgery,the First Afiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第8期980-988,共9页 Chinese General Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(82073407) 2021年江苏省重点研发计划(社会发展)(BE2021722) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目“护理学”(苏政办发[2018]87号)。
关键词 胃肿瘤 胃癌 衰弱 老年人 Tilburg衰弱量表 生活质量 不良结局 精准医疗 Stomach neoplasms Castric cancer Frailty Aged Tilburg Frailty Indicator Quality of life Adverse outcomes Precision medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献119

  • 1谭小林,赵科,文晏,汪波,周建初,曹国兴,张代江,陈黎明,程雪.重庆市农村社区老年人抑郁状况及其影响因素[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(10):2840-2842. 被引量:24
  • 2万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1283
  • 3SPRANGERS M A,CULL A,GROENVOLD M, et al. TheEuropean organization for research and treatment of cancerapproach to developing questionnaire modules: an updateand overview[j]. Qual Life Res, 1998,7(4):291 -300. 被引量:1
  • 4AARONSON N K, AHMEDZAI S,BERGMAN B,et al.Theeuropean organization for research and treatment of cancerQLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in interna-tional clinical trials in oncology [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85(5):365-376. 被引量:1
  • 5CW VICKERY,JM BLAZEBY,T CONROY,et al. Devel-opment of an EORTC disease specific quality of life modulefor use in patients with gastric cancer [J]. Eur J Cancer,2001,37(8):966-971. 被引量:1
  • 6BLAZEBY J M,CONROY T,BOITOMLEY A,et al. Clini-cal and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module,the EORTC QLQ-ST022, to assess quality of life in pa-tients with gastric cancer [j]. European Journal of Cancer,2004,40(15):2260-2268. 被引量:1
  • 7CHONGHUA WAN, QIONG MENG, ZHENG YANG,et al.Validation of the simplified chinese bersion of EORTCQLQ-C30 from the measurements of five types of in patientswith cancer[ J ] .Annals of Oncology,2008,19(12):2 053-2 060. 被引量:1
  • 8倪宗璜主编.医学统计学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:237. 被引量:1
  • 9HUSTED J A,C00K R J,FAREWELL V T,et al. Meth-ods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and rec-ommendations [J ]. J Clin Epidem,2000,53 (5):459-468. 被引量:1
  • 10戴海琦,张峰,陈雪枫.心理与教育测量.[M].(第3版)福州:暨南大学出版社;2011.22-36. 被引量:1

共引文献358

同被引文献33

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部