摘要
如何界定并担保认罪认罚的真实性,是当今我国刑事诉讼法学界关注的热门话题。作为探讨共识如何命中真实的“真理共识论”,可为认罪认罚真实性的界定和保障提供一个有效的分析工具。认罪认罚的事实是经由协商程序建构的共识性事实,该种共识坚持实质真实主义,其真实性并非不言自明,而是需要一个理性的沟通情境的担保。该种理性沟通情境由协商者平等的沟通资质、协商者自由陈述的环境、协商中信息的自由流动以及证据体系的内部融贯四要素构成。认罪认罚案件的审前程序、审判程序和证据制度需要围绕该四要素建构真实性的保障机制,以发挥各程序事前防范、事中审查和事后追证的功能,保障被告人认罪认罚的真实性。在现实中,理性沟通情境并非总能营造,未来仍有必要通过救济程序对被告人认罪认罚的真实性保持可以讨论的开放立场。
How to define and guarantee the authenticity of guilty admission and punishment acceptance is a hot topic in the field of criminal procedure law in our country today. As the “consensus of truth” which discusses how the agreement hits the truth, it can provide an effective analytical framework for the definition and guarantee of the authenticity of the content of guilty admission and punishment acceptance. The fact of confession and punishment is a consensus fact constructed by negotiation procedure. This consensus adheres to the substantial truth, and its authenticity cannot be proved by itself, but needs the guarantee of an ideal communication situation. The guarantee of the authenticity of the content of defendants’ guilty admission and punishment acceptance then evolved into the construction of ideal communication situation. The ideal communication situation consists of four elements: the equal communication qualification of the negotiator, the environment of the negotiator’s free statement, the free flow of information in the negotiation and the internal integration of the evidence. The pre-trial procedure, trial procedure and evidence system of defendants’ guilty admission and punishment acceptance cases need to construct a procedural guarantee of authenticity around the above four elements, so as to give play to the functions of preventing in advance, supervision during the event and objective evaluation of evidence after the event, finally guarantee the authenticity of the content of guilty admission and punishment acceptance. The rational communication situation in reality cannot always be realized, and it is still necessary to maintain an open position for discussion on the authenticity of the content of guilty admission and punishment acceptance through the relief procedure in the future.
出处
《法商研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期99-112,共14页
Studies in Law and Business
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(22YJC820046)。
关键词
真理共识论
协商程序
认罪认罚
理性沟通情境
真实性
the consensus of truth
negotiation procedure
the guilty admission and punishment acceptance
ideal speech situation
authenticity
