摘要
面对市民社会与国家的分裂难题,黑格尔试图运用国家来“扬弃”市民社会。但问题在于,黑格尔究竟是通过“消解”市民社会的独立性,运用国家统摄甚至消融市民社会,来完成对于市民社会的“强扬弃”?还是在“保留”市民社会之独立性的前提下,借助市民社会与国家的沟通与和解,来促成一种“弱扬弃”?两种看似区别不大的扬弃之间,暗含了对于“市民社会”完全不同的理解和定位。当马克思批评黑格尔未能成功克服市民社会与国家的分离时,马克思认为黑格尔理应施行一种“强扬弃”方案。不过,鉴于黑格尔的初衷是要维持市民社会与国家的两分结构,保证市民社会相对于国家的张力,黑格尔似更倾向于主张一种“弱扬弃”方案,即在承认市民社会之独立性与正面价值的前提之下,对市民社会施展一种“扬而不弃”。
When facing the division of civil society and the state,Hegel tried to overcome it by sublating civil society into the state.But the question is,whether Hegel appealed to some sublation in a strong sense by melting civil society completely into the state,or he just conceived of some sublation in a weak sense,and attempted to achieve the reconciliation between civil society and the state without undermining the independence of civil society.These two seemingly indistinguishable kinds of sublation implied completely different understanding of "civil society".However,if we could take Marx’s classic critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right in 1843 seriously,and on behalf of Hegel’s response to Marx’s critique carefully,we might find that by acknowledging the significance of the independence of civil society,Hegel tended to sublate civil society in its weak sense rather than in its strong sense.
出处
《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期167-179,221,共14页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“黑格尔的人格财产权理论研究”(19BZX015)
北京市社会科学基金项目“黑格尔法哲学中的自由困境”(16ZXB007)
“清华大学基础文科发展项目”。
