期刊文献+

偏向性减排目标约束与技术创新——“中国式波特假说”的检验 被引量:36

Empirical Evidence from Biased Emission Reduction Targets and Technological Innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 有关波特假说的检验一直是环境规制研究的重要方向。本文将从具有典型中国特色的地方政府偏向性减排目标约束的视角出发,检验中国式波特假说的存在性。通过手工整理中国城市层面主要污染物减排目标数据,本文从偏向性减排指标分配这一视角,研究了“十一五规划”以来地方政府减排目标约束对企业技术创新的影响。研究结果表明:“十一五规划”以来制定的减排目标具有明显的区域偏向性,表现为对欠发达地区给予较低的减排指标而对发达地区施加较高的减排指标。约束性较强的减排目标会显著提升企业的技术创新水平,并且偏向性减排目标分配进一步强化了“中国式波特假说”的存在性。以上结果主要表现在SO的减排目标约束上。偏向性减排目标对企业技术创新的促进效应在非国有企业、发达地区企业、大型企业以及高工业化水平城市企业中的政策效应更大。机制分析表明,偏向性减排目标主要通过正式环境规制以及创新补贴两个路径来促进企业技术创新水平提升。以上结论为中国实现环境治理与经济绿色高质量发展的“双赢”提供了现实依据。 Over the past 40 years of reform and opening up, China has actively participated in the socialist modernization drive, with rapid economic growth and significant improvement in economic strength, and has made remarkable achievements. With the joint efforts of the people all over the country, a moderately prosperous society will be built in an all-round way as scheduled in 2020. However, with the increase of pollutant emissions, the consumption of energy resources will increase significantly. The one-sided pursuit of economic development at the expense of environmental resources will have an immeasurable negative impact on the sustainable and healthy development of resources, ecological environment and the economy. At the same time, the central government has shifted its focus from political construction to economic construction. The criteria for appointment, selection, rewards and punishment of local officials have also changed accordingly. It no longer only pays attention to the political performance of officials, but also assesses the speed of local economic development and economic performance. Under the dual opposition model of centralization and decentralization in China, in order to achieve the economic assessment objectives and obtain limited political promotion opportunities, local governments often “selectively” implement the environmental governance policies formulated by the superior government, reduce the environmental standards of the region, and sacrifice the ecological environment of the region for rapid economic growth in the short term, leading to serious ecological environmental problems. At the same time, China is also one of the countries with the largest sewage discharge and the fastest growth rate in the world. The serious water resource pollution problem causes direct economic losses of up to 15 billion yuan each year, which has an immeasurable negative impact on people’s physical and mental health and social welfare. The negative externality of economic activities and the market fail
作者 余泳泽 林彬彬 YU Yongze;LIN Binbin(School of Public Finance And Taxation,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics;School of Jiangsu Industrial Development Research Institute,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics)
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第11期113-135,共23页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“环境目标约束下的产业高质量发展研究”(20&ZD089)的资助。
关键词 波特假说 环境规制 偏向性减排目标 企业技术创新 Porter Hypothesis Environmental Regulation Biased Emission Reduction Target Technology Innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

二级参考文献619

共引文献9836

同被引文献775

引证文献36

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部