期刊文献+

水库坝体防渗加固处理方案的比选研究 被引量:6

Comparison and Selection of Treatment Schemes for Anti-seepage Reinforcement of Reservoir Dam
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在水库的各种病险灾害中,最主要、最常见的是坝体或者库岸渗漏现象,因此,选择最佳的防渗加固方案是水利工程除险工作的重点。某水库的坝体渗流量在正常蓄水位下大约为580×104m3/a,高水位运行过程中坝坡的出逸渗流的安全性不符合规范要求。为了确保坝体的防渗安全,加固处理坝体是防渗的关键措施。通过对某水库坝体渗流状况进行深入分析,对水库大坝防渗体垂直截渗技术、防渗轴线选择、防渗体加固等进行比选,确定最佳的防渗加固方案,同时在方案的设计实施过程中应用地下水渗流分析软件GeoStudio,选择坝体加固前后不同工况下进行渗流计算。研究结果显示,实施防渗加固方案后大坝浸润线显著降低,减少了渗漏量,具备良好的防渗效果,各项指标都可以满足设计的要求。 Among all kinds of dangerous disasters of reservoir,the leakage of dam body or bank is the most common.Therefore,the selection of the best anti-seepage reinforcement scheme is the key point in the risk removal of hydraulic engineering.Seepage flow of dam body of a reservoir is about 580 under normal water level.The safety of escape seepage of dam slope during operation of high water level does not meet the requirements of specifications.To ensure the safety of dam body against seepage,reinforcement and treatment of dam body is the key measure to prevent seepage.Through in-depth analysis of seepage condition of a reservoir dam body,this paper makes comparison and selection of seepage-proof body vertical interception technology,seepage-proof axis selection,seepage-proof body reinforcement and so on,and determines the best seepage-proof reinforcement scheme.Meanwhile,during the design and implementation of the scheme,the groundwater seepage analysis software GeoStudio is applied to calculate seepage under different conditions before and after dam reinforcement.The results show that after the implementation of anti-seepage reinforcement scheme,the dam wetting line is significantly reduced,the seepage volume is reduced,and the seepage prevention effect is good.All indexes can meet the design requirements.
作者 吕绍文 LV Shao-wen(Guangzhou Conghua Water Construction Center,Guangzhou 510900,China)
出处 《云南水力发电》 2022年第11期139-142,共4页 Yunnan Water Power
关键词 水库坝体 防渗加固 处理方案 比选研究 dam body of reservoir anti-seepage reinforcement treatment scheme comparison and selection study
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1王薇:土石坝安全风险分析方法研究[D];天津大学:2012年. 被引量:1
  • 2Cho S E. Probabilistic analysis of seepage that considers the spatial varia- bility of permeability for an embankment on soil foundation [J]. Engineer- ing Geology ,2012,133:30 ~ 39. 被引量:1
  • 3沙成剐.基于Geo-Studio的土石坝渗流与稳定分析研究[D].兰州理工大学,2014. 被引量:1
  • 4Papagiannkis, A T, Fredlund, D G. A steady state model for flow in satu- rated - unsaturated soils [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1984,21 (3) :419 ~430. 被引量:1
  • 5Cho, S E, Lee, S R. Instability of unsaturated soil slopes due to infiltration [J]. Computers and Geoteehnies,2001,28 (3) : 185 ~ 208. 被引量:1
  • 6Van Genuehten M T. A closed ~ form equation for predicting the hydrau- lic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 1980,44 (5) :892 ~ 898. 被引量:1
  • 7Morgenstern N R,Price V E. The analysis of the stability of general slip surface[J]. G6oteehnique, 1965,15 ( 1 ) :79 ~ 93. 被引量:1
  • 8中华人民共和国水利部.SL274-2001.碾压式土石坝设计规范[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005. 被引量:1
  • 9于玉贞,林鸿州,李荣建,李广信.非稳定渗流条件下非饱和土边坡稳定分析[J].岩土力学,2008,29(11):2892-2898. 被引量:53
  • 10田东方,刘德富,王世梅,陈勇,肖诗荣.土质边坡非饱和渗流场与应力场耦合数值分析[J].岩土力学,2009,30(3):810-814. 被引量:28

共引文献61

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部