摘要
重复性供述排除规则作为非法证据排除规则的收尾性、保障性规则,在非法证据排除规则体系中具有极其重要的地位。为探明规则实施现状,从“引入维度”“适用维度”“效果维度”三个维度着手,对2017—2022五年间全国重复性供述排除规则的运行情况进行全景敞视考察。研究结果表明,重复性供述排除规则的引入主要受到审级与案件类型影响;重复性供述排除规则在司法实践中存在适用少、排除难、影响小等问题。为“激活”重复性供述排除规则在我国的适用,使之发挥出应有的制度功效,有必要鼓励法院依职权主动对重复性供述予以审查和排除,扩大重复性供述的排除范围,避免“两个例外”被滥用,加强对被告人供述的自愿性审查。
The repeated confession exclusion rule,as the final and safeguard rule of the rule of excluding illegal evidence,has an extremely important position.In this paper,we examine the operation of the rule in the five-year period from 2017 to 2022 from three dimensions:introduction,application and effect.The empirical study shows that the introduction is mainly influenced by the trial level and case type.Also,since very few cases apply to this rule,the repeated confession is hard to exclude,and the rule has poor application effect.In order to activate the application of the repeated confession exclusion rule in China and make it play its proper role,it is necessary to encourage courts to examine and then exclude repeated confessions,expand the scope of exclusion,avoid the abuse of the two exceptions,and strengthen the voluntary review of defendants'confessions.
作者
郭泽宇
贾紫涵
GUO Ze-yu;JIA Zi-han(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《太原学院学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第6期19-32,共14页
Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
重复性供述排除规则
实证研究
规则完善
repeated confession exclusion rule
empirical study
rule improvement
