期刊文献+

乳腺癌患者体质量管理的证据总结 被引量:3

Evidence Summary of Weight Management in Breast Cancer Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结乳腺癌患者体质量管理的最佳证据,为医护人员指导乳腺癌患者进行体质量管理提供依据。方法采用主题词结合自由词系统检索UpToDate、Clinicalkey、BMJ最佳临床实践、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、PubMed、EMbase等数据库中关于乳腺癌患者体质量管理的最佳临床实践、指南、专家共识、系统评价。结果共纳入相关文献14篇,其中指南8篇、专家共识2篇、系统评价4篇。最终形成34条证据,包括体质量管理的必要性、目标、评估及策略。结论该研究总结了乳腺癌患者体质量管理的最佳证据,可为开展乳腺癌患者体质量管理提供循证依据。 Objective To summarize the best evidence for weight management in breast cancer patients and to provide reference for medical staff to guide weight management for breast cancer patients.Methods A computer search of the databases of UpToDate,Clinicalkey,BMJ Best Practice,Cochrane Library,CINAHL,PubMed,Embase and so on.The MeSH thesauri or the self-built thesauri combined with free words search was used to systematically search the best practice,guidelines,expert consensus and systematic reviews on weight management of breast cancer patients.Results Fourteen articles were included,including 8 guidelines,2 expert consensuses and 4 systematic reviews and thirty-four pieces of evidence were summarized,including the necessity,goals,assessment and strategies of weight management.Conclusion The best evidence summary of weight management for breast cancer patients provides evidence-based referece for medical staffs to carry out weight management for breast cancer patients.
作者 庞立莎 路潜 刘春蕾 朱飞 PANG U-sha;LU Qian;UU Chun-lei;ZHU Fei(Schoo!of Nursings Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China;School of Nursing,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《护理学报》 北大核心 2022年第19期35-40,共6页 Journal of Nursing(China)
基金 河北省卫生健康委医学科学研究课题(20170840) 河北大学高层次人才科研启动项目(521100221002) 河北大学医学学科培育项目(2021B14)
关键词 乳腺癌 体质量 体质量管理 证据总结 breast cancer weight weight management evidence summarize
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献52

  • 1詹思延.临床指南研究与评价工具简介[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2007,2(5):375-377. 被引量:46
  • 2Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emer- ging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of reeommendation[J]. BMJ, 2008,336 (7650) : 924-926. 被引量:1
  • 3The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting Document for the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation[J]. The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2014. ht- tp://joannabriggs, org/ibi-approach, html tabbed-nay Lev- els-of-Evidence. 被引量:1
  • 4Balshem H, Hell M, Schunemann, HJ,et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence[J]. J of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011,64(4) :401-406. 被引量:1
  • 5J Kondrup,S.P Allison,M Elia,B Vellas,M Plauth.ESPEN Guidelines for Nutrition Screening 2002[J].Clinical Nutrition.2003(4) 被引量:11
  • 6Yves Guigoz,Sylvie Lauque,Bruno J Vellas.Identifying the elderly at risk for malnutrition[J]. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine . 2002 (4) 被引量:3
  • 7Zigmond A S,Snaith R P.The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica . 1983 被引量:3
  • 8Ottery F D.Rethinking nutritional support of the cancer patient: the new field of nutritional oncology. Seminars in Oncology . 1994 被引量:3
  • 9Pamela Charney.Nutrition Screening vs Nutrition Assessment: How Do They Differ?. Nutrition in Clinical Practice . 2008 被引量:1
  • 10David August,Maureen Huhmann.A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines: Nutrition Support Therapy During Adult Anticancer Treatment and in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition . 2009 被引量:2

共引文献2552

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部