摘要
聚焦基层执法妥协现象,运用案例研究方法,构建“场域结构—话语体系—执法变异”的分析框架,呈现基层城管执法形态分殊机制,发现:转型中国社会并行存在的三套彼此之间充满张力的话语体系,即传统民本话语体系、政治意识形态话语体系和理性法律话语体系,加剧了执法主体稳定维持理性法律话语互动框架的难度,从而为多样化的执法形态塑造了可能空间。当城管执法力量能够将行政相对人持续纳入理性法律话语互动体系,依法执法形态就是可预期的。当道德舆论机制、执法风险机制、政治问责机制存在,且或独立或协同发挥作用时,理性法律话语体系向伦理化的政治意识形态话语体系的转换将得以实现,执法妥协现象因此更有可能产生。反之,如果执法主体既缺乏充分的执法能力维持理性法律话语互动框架的稳定性,又缺乏足够的外部压力推动其向备选的话语体系框架转化,执法对峙局面将更有可能滑向执法冲突。将依法执法、执法冲突、执法妥协纳入统一的分析框架,更完整地呈现了基层执法图景。
The compromise phenomenon of grass-roots law enforcement is studied and an interpretative framework of fieldstructure-discourse system-law enforcement variation is constructed through case study,presenting a specific mechanism of law en-forcement of grassroots urban management. It is found that the three sets of discourse systems full of tension in the transformation of Chi-nese society have aggravated the difficulty for the law enforcement to stably maintain the interactive framework of a rational legal dis-course,thereby creating possibilities for diversified forms of law enforcement. When forces of urban management law enforcement cancontinue to incorporate administrative counterparts into the interactive system of rational legal discourse,the form of law enforcement ispredictable. When moral public opinion mechanisms,law enforcement risk mechanisms and political accountability mechanisms existand work independently or cooperatively,there will be a switch from a rational legal discourse system to an ethical political ideologicaldiscourse system and may result in law enforcement compromise. Conversely,if law enforcement entities lack sufficient law enforcementcapabilities to maintain the stability of the interactive framework of the rational legal discourse and lack sufficient external pressure topromote their transformation to alternative discourse system frameworks,law enforcement confrontation will more likely result in law en-forcement conflicts. A more comprehensive understanding of the grassroots law enforcement is presented by incorporating law enforce-ment,law enforcement conflicts and law enforcement compromises into a unified interpretative framework.
作者
陈天祥
吕忠
CHEN Tianxiang;LÜZhong
出处
《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期17-30,205,共15页
Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition
基金
研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于数据赋能的基层社会治理现代化研究”(20AZD088)。
关键词
基层执法
执法妥协
执法冲突
话语体系
grassroots law enforcement
law enforcement compromise
law enforcement conflict
discourse system
