摘要
揭示《伤寒论》的原始面貌是伤寒学术研究的一个重要课题,自元末王安道提出质疑以来,历代多有研究,但皆失于零碎,至今无明确结论。文章立足于《伤寒论》的“三阴三阳”篇与“可与不可”篇,以文本发生学的方法对不同版本进行对比研究,指出5个明确的证据以确证伤寒原貌为“三阴三阳”编次,非“可与不可”编次。从文本出现的时间先后来说,“三阴三阳”篇在前,“可与不可”篇在后,王叔和通过“集”或“重集”的方式,以“三阴三阳”篇为底本,按照不可汗、可汗、不可下、可下等原则转录类辑成“可与不可”篇。
It is an important subject for academic research on Shanghan Lun to reveal the original appearance of the Shanghan Lun. Since WANG An-dao questioned it at the end of the Yuan dynasty, there have been many researches in the past dynasties, but they are all lost in fragments and no definite conclusion has been reached up to now. Based on the ‘three yin and three yang’ and ‘can or not’ chapters of Shanghan Lun, this paper makes a comparative study of different editions by means of textual genetics, and points out that five clear evidences confirm the original appearance of Shanghan Lun as the ‘three yin and three yang’ order, and must be the ‘can or not’ order. In terms of the time sequence of the texts, ‘three yin and three yang’ is in the first place, and ‘can or not’ is in the second place. WANG Shu-he transcribes the ‘can or not’ with the ‘three yin and three yang’as the base by means of ‘collection’ or ‘recollection’, according to the principles of ‘do not sweat’, ‘can sweat’, ‘do not catharsis’,‘can catharsis’.
作者
姚鑫
杨必安
闫敏敏
胡锦晗
朱志
黄作阵
YAO Xin;YANG Bi-an;YAN Min-min;HU Jin-han;ZHU Zhi;HUANG Zuo zhen(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 102488,China)
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第10期5711-5714,共4页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
2018年北京市社会科学基金项目(No.18LSB002)
北京中医药大学2020年度基本科研重点攻关项目(No.2020-JYB-ZDGG-099)。
关键词
可与不可
脉经
三阴三阳
伤寒论
伤寒原貌
Can or not
Maijing
Three yin and three yang
Shanghan Lun
Original appearance of Shanghan Lun
