摘要
数字人文并不仅是一种研究方法,而且有着整体性方法论的意义。尽管文学领域对于数字人文方法论有着一定的学术自觉,但缺乏足够的理性反思。事实上,我们可以通过四重追问来夯实理性反思。通过思想史追问发现数字人文方法是涉及数字人文学科自主性与合法性的方法论;通过情绪论追问发现数字人文方法关涉到“失向”这一生存体验以及“理性傲慢”的时代情绪;通过本体论追问发现数字人文方法背后的数字对象及数据经验等本体存在;通过主体性追问发现数字人文中从生产主体到研究主体的转变。
Digital humanities is not only a particular approach in research but also a methodology of holistic significance. Although the field of literary studies engages the methodology of digital humanities, more critical reflections upon it are needed. This article proposes a four-layered interrogation about the methodology of digital humanities so as to enhance such critical reflections. The interrogations are as follows. First, we may find that digital humanities involves such questions as autonomy and legitimation through interrogating the history of intellectual thought. Second, we can find existential experience of disorientation and rational hubris in our age through interrogating the emotion of the time. Third, we can discover the digital objects and digital experience underlying the methodology of digital humanities through ontological interrogation. Finally, we can reveal the transformation from the subject of production to that of research through interrogating subjectivity.
作者
杨庆峰
Yang Qingfeng(Bioethics Center and a researcher in the Fudan Development Institute at Fudan University.;Fudan Development Institute,Fudan University,220 Handan Road,Shanghai,200433,China)
出处
《文艺理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期81-93,共13页
Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“当代新兴增强技术前沿的人文主义哲学研究”[项目编号:20&ZD045]的阶段性成果。
关键词
数字人文
理性方法
数字方法
本体
主体
digital humanities
rational method
digital method
ontology
subject
