摘要
目的通过Meta分析系统评价癌因性疲乏与希望的相关性。方法计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMbase、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、知网、维普、万方数据库关于癌因性疲乏与希望相关性的研究,检索时限均为建库至2021年8月。采用AHRQ的观察性研究质量评价标准进行质量评价,RevMan 5.3软件分析数据。结果共纳入16个研究,2965例癌症患者。Meta分析显示:癌因性疲乏与希望的合并相关系数为-0.35[95%CI(-0.40,-0.29),Z=12.03(P<0.00001)]。在肺癌组、乳腺癌组、消化道癌症组、其他癌症组中,二者的相关系数分别为-0.36、-0.29、-0.35、-0.33,组间差异无统计学意义。在样本量、年份、地区、不同量表间存在差异。结论当前证据表明,癌症患者的希望水平越高,癌因性疲乏得分越低,癌因性疲乏程度可能越轻;希望水平可能与癌症患者的癌症类型无关。
Objective To systematically review the correlation between cancer-related fatigue(CRF)and hope of patients with cancer.Methods The PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,Web of Science,CBM,CNKI,VIP and WangFang databases were searched to collect studies on the correlation between CRF and hope from the establishment of database to July 31,2021.The quality of the literatures was assessed by the AHRQ standard,and the RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.Results A total of 16 literatures involving 2965 cancer patients were included.Meta-analysis showed that the combined correlation coefficient between CRF and hope was-0.35[95%CI(-0.40,-0.29),Z=12.03(P<0.00001)].In the lung cancer group,breast cancer group,gastrointestinal cancer group,and other types of cancer group,the correlation coefficients of the two were-0.36,-0.29,-0.35,-0.33,respectively,and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.There were differences in sample size,year,region and different scales.Conclusion Current evidence shows that the higher the hope level of cancer patients,the lower the CRF score,and the lower the degree of CRF.The hope level may not be related to the cancer type of the cancer patient.
作者
刘芯言
云洁
吴琪
陈倩
LIU Xin-yan(School of Nursing,Chengdu University of TCM,Chengdu 610072,China)
出处
《牡丹江医学院学报》
2022年第5期82-86,共5页
Journal of Mudanjiang Medical University
