摘要
主流学界将“黄陆军案”看作司法适用“保护规范理论”的先兆,这一认识的局限性在于它未关注到该案与此前司法判断思路的关系。经过多年发展,我国司法上客观形成了以合法权益和因果关系为构成要件、以“行政侵害”为核心的判断框架。考察行政审判案例评析意见中的论证并对照此前的判断框架,发现该案延续了原来的判断框架。该案表明我国原有的“行政侵害”判断框架通过发展也可具备与“保护规范理论”相似的判断内容,考虑到更换解释论的弊端,可通过延续原判断框架并优化其内容的方式回应解释需求,而将解释论更换为“保护规范理论”并非必需。
The mainstream scholars regard the Huang Lujun Case as the beginning of the judicial application of“the theory of protection norms”,which has limitations in that it fails to pay attention to the relationship between the case and the previous thinking of judicial determination.After years of development,our country has in judiciary practice formed such determination framework which takes legitimate rights/interests and causality as its constitutive elements,with“administrative infringement”being the core philosophy.Upon reviewing the arguments in the analysis of this case and comparing with the previous determination framework,it is found that this case follows the original determination framework.The case shows that the original determination framework of administrative infringement and its improvement in our country can also have similar determination content to those of the theory of protection norms.Considering the disadvantage related to the replacement of interpretive theory,we can respond to the need of interpretation by continuing and optimizing the original determination framework,and it is not necessary to replace the interpretive theory with“the theory of protection norms”.
作者
叶秋艳
YE Qiu-yan(KoGuan School of Law,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030)
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期155-165,共11页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
国家社科基金重点课题“城镇土地和空间规划的法治保障”(项目编号:16AZD022)。
关键词
原告资格
黄陆军案
保护规范理论
因果关系
行政侵害判断
Plaintiff’s Qualification
Huang Lujun Case
the Theory of Protection Norms
Causality
Determination of Administrative Infringement
