摘要
[目的/意义]科研人员在写作和阅读科学论文时分别扮演着作者与读者两类不同角色,对科学论文内容存在不同程度的语义解构。目前的出版平台主要是从作者写作角度呈现科学论文内容,缺乏适应读者阅读的科学论文内容呈现模式。[方法/过程]为了弥补这一研究空白,文章提出了基于论证结构的科学论文内容呈现模式。首先从读者阅读角度,在图尔敏论证模型基础上构建了科学论文通用论证结构模型;然后以化学领域的科学论文为样本,采用内容分析法对该模型的学科适用性进行了验证,并基于该模型设计了基于论证结构的科学论文内容呈现模式;为了评估该呈现模式的可用性,将其与目前新兴的面向语义出版的RichHTML论文内容呈现模式进行了用户对比测评。[结果/结论]实验结果表明,与RichHTML呈现模式相比,基于论证结构的呈现模式显著降低了读者获取科学论文主旨大意的阅读时间,提高了获取主旨大意信息的准确性以及用户满意度。
[Purpose/significance]Researchers respectively act two different roles as authors and readers when writing and reading scientific articles,which leads to different-degree semantic deconstruction of scientific articles.Nowdays,scientific articles are mainly presented to readers from the perspective of writing,and lacking of the presentation mode from the perspective of reading.[Method/process]To make up for this research gap,we proposed a content presentation mode of scientific articles based on their argument structure.Firstly,from the perspective of reading,we constructed a general argument structure model for scientific articles based on the Toulmin Argument Model.Secondly,we took the scientific articles in the field of chemistry as samples,verified the applicability of the argument structure model in a specific discipline using content analysis method,and designed the presentation mode based on the argument structure model.Finally,to evaluate the usability of the proposed presentation mode,we compared it with a newly-developing presentation mode RichHTML for semantic publishing using user evaluation method.[Result/conclusion]The experimental results showed that the presentation mode based on argument structure significantly decreased the reading time of understanding the main idea of scientific articles,improve the accuracy of information acquisition and user satisfaction.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第10期155-163,共9页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于关联数据的学术文献内容语义发布及其应用研究”(项目编号:17ATQ001)
国家自然科学基金重点国际(地区)合作研究项目“大数据环境下的知识组织与服务创新研究”(项目编号:71420107026)的成果。
关键词
论证结构
科学论文
呈现模式
科学阅读
可用性测评
argument structure
scientific articles
presentation mode
scientific reading
usability evaluation