摘要
“新清史”自美国兴起后引起中国学者思考与讨论。以强调满洲民族意识与清朝帝国性质为中心的“新清史”,否认明清之际中国历史的延续性,冲击了传统清史认识中的“汉化”观。对此,国内学者大都持相反观点,因文化背景、思考角度不同,回应“新清史”的侧重点不同。对“新清史”的回应,不仅仅是简单的“捍卫汉化”,更是反思过去清史研究路径,思考民族、国家等观念的建构。
The rise of “the Neo-Qing history” in the United States caused scholars to think about and discuss it. The Neo-Qing history, which emphasizes the national consciousness of Manchuria and the imperial nature of the Qing Dynasty, denies the continuity of Chinese history during the Ming and Qing Dynasties, and has a great impact on the concept of “sinicization” in the traditional understanding of Qing history. In this regard, most domestic scholars hold the opposite view. Due to different cultural backgrounds and perspectives, they have different emphases in responding to the Neo-Qing history. The response to the Neo-Qing history is not only a simple “defense of sinicization”, but also reflections on the research paths of the past Qing history and in-depth reflections on the construction of concepts such as a nation and a people.
作者
刘佳瑄
LIU Jiaxuan(School of Humanities,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200233,China)
出处
《镇江高专学报》
2022年第4期85-89,共5页
Journal of Zhenjiang College
关键词
“新清史”
汉化
国家认同
民族认同
“the Neo-Qing history”
sinicization
national recognition
ethnic recognition
