期刊文献+

国际反兴奋剂结果管理机制的变革和中国实践 被引量:3

Change in International Anti-Doping Result Management Procedures and China’s Practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际反兴奋剂结果管理程序正经历重大变革,我国也需紧跟国际改革步伐。运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法等方法对国际反兴奋剂结果管理程序的改革动因和改革措施进行了总结和分析。研究发现,改革呈现出加强国际反兴奋剂结果管理程序的统一性、增强对结果管理机构的分权制衡、强化世界反兴奋剂机构对结果管理的监督的趋势。此外,我国的反兴奋剂结果管理的预审、听证和上诉程序都取得了长足的发展。研究认为,我国在《体育法》修订后,应理顺结果管理机制、明确国家反兴奋剂机构的主导地位、充分发挥处罚委员会的制度优势、加强听证委员会和体育仲裁委员会的制衡功能,创设更具中国特色的结果管理机制。 The international anti-doping results management procedures are undergoing major changes,and China also needs to keep up with the pace of international reform. Adopting literature analysis,logic analysis and other methods,this paper summarizes and analyzes the reform motivation and reform measures of the international antidoping results management procedures. The study finds that the reform shows a trend of strengthening the uniformity of international anti-doping results management procedures,strengthening the checks and balances over results management authorities,and strengthening WADA’s supervision of results management. In addition,China has made significant progress in the pre-adjudication,hearing,and appeal procedures of anti-doping results management. The study holds that after amending the Law on Physical Culture and Sports,China should establish a clear result management mechanism,clarify the dominant position of the National Anti-Doping Agency,give full play to the coordination function of the Punishment Committee,and strengthen the checks and balances of the Hearing Committee and the Sports Arbitration Committee,thus creating a result management mechanism with more Chinese characteristics.
作者 宋彬龄 SONG Binling(Law School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,Hunan China;Collaborative Innovation Center for Hunan Legalization and Local Governance,Xiangtan 411105,Hunan China)
出处 《北京体育大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第8期51-61,共11页 Journal of Beijing Sport University
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“反兴奋剂法治体系及防控机制研究”(项目编号:20ZD337) 湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目“《反兴奋剂条例》修改研究”(项目编号:20A504)。
关键词 反兴奋剂 结果管理 听证 体育仲裁 anti-doping result management hearing sports arbitration
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1郭树理,黄莹.美国反兴奋剂机构的仲裁制度[J].武汉体育学院学报,2007,41(1):6-9. 被引量:6
  • 2杨良宜.国际商务仲裁[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996:478. 被引量:1
  • 3Matthew Hard. Caught in the Net: Athletes' Rights and the World Anti-Doping Agency [J ].Southern California Interdisci- plinary Law Journal ,2010(19) :555-586. 被引量:1
  • 4Transparency International - Czech Republic.Why Sport is not Immune to Corruption[EB/OLl. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/epas/ Source/Ressources/EPAS_INFO Bures_en.pdf, 2008-12-01. 被引量:1
  • 5Matthew Hard Janwillem Soek. The Legal Nature of Doping Law [J]. The International Sports Law Journal, 2002(2):4-9. 被引量:1
  • 6Gabrielle Kaufman-Kohler, Antonio Rigozzi. Legal Opinion on the Conformity of Article 10.6 of the 2007 Draft World Anti-Doping Code with Fundamental Rights of Athletes [EB/ OL].http ://www.wada -ama.org/rtecontent/document/Legal_ Opinion_Conformity_10_6_complete_document.pdf, 2007 - 11 - 13. 被引量:1
  • 7CAS arbitration N CAS OG 00/289 [EB/OL]. http://jurispru- dence.tas -cas.org/sites/CaseLaw/Shared% 20Documents/289. pdf, 2011-02-24. 被引量:1
  • 8Cyclist Arrested in Austria [EB/OL]. http://sports.espn.go. com/oly/cycling/news/story ? id=4000571,2009-03-20. 被引量:1
  • 9Janwillem Soek.The Strict Liability Principle and the Human Rights of the Athlete in Doping Cases [EB/OL]. http://pub- lishing.eur.nl/ir/repub/asset/7548/DISS +INTEGRAL.pdf, 2011 - 04-20. 被引量:1
  • 10Richard H. McLaren. Twenty-five Years of the Court of Arbi- trations for Sport: A Look in the Rear-view Mirror [J]. Mar- quette Sports Law Review, 2010 (20) : 305 -325. 被引量:1

共引文献53

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部